Panic! Panic Everywhere, Everybody! Or, just.. don't, and take reasonable actions instead.

in #life9 months ago

So, we've all been alarmed at the recent Biden threat to make a jab for 'everyone' that 'actually works', (this time, eh? A tacit admission that the jabs weren't safe and effective, and when he said 'if you get [the jabs] you won't get covid' he lied) which sounds like a threat to forcibly inject everyone with another vector for horrific illness and death.

I'm pretty sure that a lot more people are not only gonna opt out of volunteering for any such thing, but are scaling a hill to die on, because being on higher ground is a military advantage, and, like me, are not going to surrender to whatever vile purpose is behind all this crap. The jabs we've already seen were a bunch of different experiments. I suspect whatever they found out from those tests is going to be used on us this time around. Since I wasn't running the experiments, I don't know what they found out, so I don't know what they're planning. I do know that IT'S NOT GOOD, because the jabs were illegal medical experiments we were coerced into by people committing genocidal crimes against humanity, and those people cannot do good. Those are evil people.

The WSJ has come out with a vaguely worded threat about 'Pirola' maybe being hella horribly worser than what it evolved from and is replacing (which replacement means it's less deadly, because that increases it's own ability to survive infecting it's hosts. Viruses can't lay eggs. They can only borrow our cells' ability to pump out proteins and RNA to reproduce, and that ability ends when cells die, so being more deadly makes a pathogen less successful), and Dr. Byram Bridle sorts their panic inducing fear-mongering. If you are at all alarmed at the vague threat such articles are making, his discussion of Pirola should relieve you.

Also, look for weasel words in articles like that: may, might, could, and etc. You may, might, and could get hit by an asteroid. Remember, fear-mongering is literally, actually, and really terrorism. That article in the WSJ is an act of terrorism. They're trying to make you afraid for political purposes. Don't negotiate with terrorists. Once they commit an act of terrorism, remember they did that. Terrorists suck. They're awful people, and they will never suddenly 'do the right thing' and become devoted to your welfare. They have proved no one is more vile and predatory than they are, they're fucking terrorists FFS! They're trying to psychologically torture you into submitting to whatever makes them money, or more powerful, or whatever they're after. Cut your losses and never, ever have anything to do with them again. There are plenty of good people in the world you can get information you need from that aren't going to lie to get power over you. Talk and deal with those good people instead. You'll be glad you did.

We're being abused with the full panoply of plandemic threats again. Contact tracing (not carrying a phone, or having a degoogled phone fixes that tracking software problem. At least they're not putting big, plastic tags in our ears like farmers do cows), a new round of jabbing, bans on gatherings, forced disassociation (unless you're violently rioting and looting because you're a racist, or a sexual creep, demanding children be castrated, mutilated, and psychologically deranged if they can be brow beaten into not resisting the grooming pressure), and forced masking are back. All this crap is only legal to do to chattel. You can't force free people to do any of this lawfully. That's the point of being free people.

Since I don't carry a phone, won't be jabbed, and will ignore orders to not associate with whomever I choose however I please, the masking thing is the one that tends to be the most bothersome to me, because it's only been a couple months since the medical overlords gave up trying to force me to wear a mask in their holy presence. Over and over again the poor office staff tried to browbeat me into wearing a mask, but HIPAA makes them unable to even question the statement 'I cannot wear a mask', because if they try to argue you can, they're violating your private health information they are legally forbidden to violate, specifically them, and specifically that particular information.

It's not any of their business why we can't wear a mask, and the law specifically forbids medical people from discussing your medical business in a way that divulges medical information about you to anyone you haven't authorized in writing to have it, and it's the office staff that burden lands on, because they're the data processing people in that industry. That's what HIPAA does. Now, these agencies politically sidestep HIPAA blatantly, illegally, and constantly, by using electronic databases to store that information on that are ridiculously insecure to begin with. They also have been finagling ways to get it to Big Media corporations, that pay handsomely for it, for lots of terrible reasons, such as to try to profit off your medical misery. But the office help aren't protected by the bribes the agency administrators are, and they know damn well they'll get thrown under a bus in a heartbeat if they personally violate HIPAA and you get litigious.

I really want to have a nice and pleasant experience when I go see the doc, not verbally spar with office drones, and as we senesce we need to handle aging with medical care. I can assure people under 50 that you will be surprised by how wrong things you took for granted can go, and how much discomfort usually reliable things, like feet, elbows, or belly buttons, can cause you, just because you've had them for more than half a century. There's a reason old people talk about illness and medicine all the time. I can't really not go to the doc just because the health industry is owned by diabolical profiteers. My doctor is actually really nice and understanding - they literally never even mentioned jabbing me. I have cited so many published papers and research talking about my medical care they don't even check my sources anymore. I tell them what I need and they prescribe it.

But they're not in charge of the facility where they work. They can't step out of their lane anymore than anyone else with a paying job can. I don't expect them to prescribe cocaine, vacations in Bali, or beat their office staff into submission. I have to deal with those hazards and get those benefits on my own, and that includes confronting office staff that are instructed to violate my rights by their office management boss(s), and who are just doing the things they get paid to do to get the money they need to soothe their shattered dreams with strong drink. I try to keep in mind that it's not their policy, although most of them probably completely believe in it because they have never read a scientific paper trying to justify masking in their lives.

Masks are actually hazardous to your health. They trap pathogens and make you breathe them back in after your body managed to evict them. They shed microplastics and other toxins. I need to use masks in my work, and OSHA has rules about how long someone can do some work in a mask. They reduce the O2 you can suck in from the atmosphere, and increase the CO2 you breathe, and they can do too much of both. But you don't have to believe me, because Dr. Robert Malone agrees with me on the matter. He's very brief here, and doesn't go into most of the hazards, but you can read the dozens of scientific studies I have, many of which are trying really hard to claim masks prevent viral transmission in practice. This is an old list, and new studies are out since I made this list, but they just say the same thing.

MaskStudies.png

No study ever has ever shown masks to prevent viral transmission in practice. They cannot show they do, because they don't. The only PPE that can prevent viral transmission is a moon suit with an external air supply. That's just the scientific fact of viruses and anyone that tells you otherwise either doesn't know the facts, or is lying to you. Some people do both.

ForcedMasking.jpg

I have video of Fauci doing both, but in the above he hadn't got the memo (or written it) yet, and he told the simple truth: a mask cannot keep viruses out, nor in. Respirators can't either. They cannot fit perfectly, and the viruses are fractions of a millionth of an inch in size, so they sail through any tiny imperfection unimpeded. Since a virus is a little machine that hijacks your cells to make viruses it only takes one of them to infect you. But the research is not equivocal, and that's what really matters. No research has ever showed that masks of any kind actually prevent viral transmission in actual practice.

I'm probably going to have to address these issues again, because people are going to suffer from political machinations intended to coerce them to submit. I wanted to get these done and over with now, but even though I hope I reach everyone and these plain facts convince them and no one will back down, I expect to ride in this rodeo again, just like last time.

I hope you're better prepared for this ride than you were the last.