"your reply here has mentioned it..."
No, it doesn't. Stop putting words in my mouth.
"...you align yourself with this study."
You're doing it again. I'm pointing to evidence and data that disproves the AGW scam. That's not anything else but that. Quit insinuating, implying, and maligning me and others, and discuss the data and evidence, or go talk to others that want to deprecate dissent and obfuscate facts.
"...you want to pursue financial interests."
You do it again. Not once have I mentioned financial interests of mine in this discussion, and you continually try to assert that I do. It is now obviously malicious. Quote me when you claim I said something, so I can prove you're wrong.
"...if you believe that climate change is real, then you will feel guilt and blame yourself for enabling it..."
I have stated climate change is provably real, and that all humanity is incapable of causing it. You must be projecting your reason for such blatant disingenuity, unless you're actually on the take, in which case you're projecting to deflect consequences away from you.
"...you need this study to be right."
I need civil society to prosper, and the facts in evidence reveal a $275T scam ongoing that will dramatically harm people I care very much about. This study discusses those facts in evidence, so I have posted it to alert people so they can prevent being scammed and enable civil society to prosper. You, as is typical of your claims, insinuate more, that I am psychologically some kind of zealot - but again, that's only another baseless and false claim about me you're making up out of hole cloth to malign me, dissent against the AGW scam, and the authors of the linked paper.
You have proved you have no interest in scientific evidence, but are only interested in derogation of my character. Perhaps you can find some self esteem that isn't derived from putting others down with proper counseling. I don't provide that service here.
I was explaining how I see you based on what you've demonstrated. you're saying you don't agree with it. that's fine.
jesus. just change that sentence to "if you believe that anthropogenic climate change".
man, something is really off with how you read others. if they're not incredibly specific, the conversation is derailed. yeah, you can blame it on them. on me. go ahead.
I don't think that was derogatory. I think it places you in a pretty average position as a human being.
you know what? I agree with you. it is very derogatory. it sucks that this was the conclusion I came to. I wish it was different. but it is what it is and I just have to deal with it. having someone tell you this must suck, but dealing with this sucks too, so... shrug. we part ways