A quick look at the first link shows that all those videos are a year old. Does the JD entity still exist? Also, can you link the specific discussions of Birth Certificate information, and the subsequent steps to restore lawful sovereignty?
"I had known a guy in England since my odysee days in 2021, when i had a channel of 700+ subs on Extricate The System 1.0. This man same age as you, carpenter by trade, had left the system cold turkey as mentioned above 15 years ago, whilst still retaining his house, though he has no bank account, no driver license, no passport, as all these pertain to the legal person...you must play the role of a legal person to get these "privileges"..."
I am attempting to use a different system, in the belief that contracts I have not signed do not lawfully obligate me, and my signature on fraudulent contracts that use deception to trick me into giving up my sovereignty (because I am not provided information regarding the true mechanism of registration, of my birth, my title to real property, my car, and etc., and am not informed that sovereigns have allodial title, which is theft by fraud in which government is the primary mechanism of enslavement, and corrupt courts a principal in imposing that theft), I am acting on mutual agreements between sovereigns outside of that legal system that has been utterly corrupted and is become a weapon against humanity, with goodwill as the means of exchange. This is not an easy thing to do, first, because I have to devise such mechanisms without prior examples to base them on, nominal to replace the legal system that has been developed for millennia, and which most people don't even conceive isn't lawful and obligatory, and then I must also inspire and recruit others to transact with me via this novel system.
I mostly do these things without going into detail at all, or even discussing them, simply by creating goodwill balances with good people, whom faithfully deliver what I need from them they can provide upon request when I am in need. There is no quid pro quo, because the burden of creating specific mutual understanding outside of recorded contracts (which invoke the corrupted system) is insuperable. In fact I did not fully comprehend the system I was avoiding myself, much less have the ability to explain it to others, until BurnTheCorporateFiction laid bare to me the foundation and structure upon it of the system stealing sovereignty. I almost always 'overpay' as a result, because when I need something, I need it, and I have learned it is more likely to be available when it is far below the value of goodwill I have on account. I also handle lesser things with cash, because it is expensive in labor to buy fuel, for example, otherwise. Losing cash will dramatically raise my expenses, because of this.
"...where are you capturing my meta data?"
The issue is that you, the sovereign, are being assigned to the legal fiction when that metadata is used against you. If you successfully challenge the legal fiction, then there is no alternate legal mechanism to use the metadata against the sovereign (There is no potential to discuss the law with AI, that will simply act as it's programmed without any ability for you to challenge its jurisdiction. That is why we will be forced to use digital ID, with our biometrics linked to the legal fiction by default. Having the biometric features the legal fiction is assigned will be probative to AI and define your meatsicle as the legal fiction. There will be no appeal if you are assigned digital ID - which they are prepared to issue without your consent, and will apply to you whether you ever use it or not. They have your biometric data, from DNA to facial recognition. It is impossible to prevent them from capturing this biometric information on us, and in many real ways privacy is literally impossible to maintain, such as metadata we generate with the entities we interact with conducting our affairs. These entities consider their interactions generate their own data, that they can dispose as they see fit, because it's their property. Your data about those interactions is also yours, but that's not their data about their interactions with you they own just as much as you own your data about your interactions with them. When that data is centralized by selling it to brokers, a copy of your data specific to you becomes created by that centralization of all the entities' data you have interacted with, and there's no sound lawful basis to prevent that centralization. Private property is private property, and if you argue your property is yours, you cannot also argue their property is yours. Privacy is obviated by accounting technology, and that is a fact of tech advance).
It is the use of this data applied to a fraudulent legal fiction that is unlawful, and enabling AI to govern eliminates the law entirely. That is the threat today facing us, and why I have never once used AI - because that implies consent to interacting with AI at all. I do not consent, and cannot be shown to have ever consented to handing over my data to AI I know to be AI. Insofar as any legal system will exist such consent will not be found, and my ability to opt out of being regulated by AI should be maintained because I have not consented, ever, implicitly or otherwise, to interacting with AI. I doubt AI will care, however.
Of course, armed violence remains an option to pedopaths to crush dissent, and the only answer to that is superior arms, which are unlawfully proscribed sovereigns in every jurisdiction on Earth, so the ability to defend yourself from AI controlled drones will be considered unlawful by AI a priori, and there is no help for that but to successfully defend yourself from it with superior arms, which is not reasonably possible because AI can nuke you from space. That leaves only being concealed and operating as a sovereign covertly. But that, as already discussed, is impossible in a surveillance state, too.
All said, the time is now, before AI is imposed, to prevent total enslavement and genocide of humanity. AI is the eradication of law, replacing law with tech. It is unlawful, but without a legal system that operates lawfully, there is only recourse to violence or secrecy, both of which seem to be impossible in practice as well - unless we act before we are genocided while we have superior numbers and that ability to impose the nominal violence to eliminate the polity(s) eliminating the law.
Of course, death takes us all - but not institutions, nor AI. We must succeed as a society, which alone has the potential to persist outside of institutions or AI, and persist permanently to oppose them. Homogeneous societies are highly potential of such resistance, which is why societies are being heterogenized, which renders them less competent to act the more heterogeneous they are.
I will have a look at your other links presently. The issues discussed above pertain regardless of legal fictions, however, and require our attention.
Thanks!
I do understand that dog latin and English aren't the same language, even though they use words in common, those words mean different things in the latin on the documents. This all makes sense to me now, once I understood the historical background and how registration was slyly used to acquire title by the state, which eliminated allodial title and enabled property tax. This same technique is used for personal property as well. While the WEF says by 2030 we won't have any property, that's really already the case, and most people don't even know it! I appreciate very much the background information on Rohan and Romley, as it makes clear why that content isn't presently continuing to be produced.