The most terrible aspect of the scam is that CO2 is the basis of terrestrial life. During the LGM (late glacial maximum) atmospheric CO2 dropped to ~190ppm, and had climate not warmed (releasing CO2 from the oceans) mass extinctions could well have become self-reinforcing and unstoppable until the Earth was sterilized, because below that level plants begin to starve to death for want of CO2, which is required for photosynthesis.
This is one of the most important facts "scientists" and "journalists" hide from us. The Earth become greener thanks to CO2.
You may find this research very insightful. Give it a look when you have time for it.
Edit: I have long suspected a connection between descriptions in the Mahabharata of the devastating war it recounts and the Younger Dryas that ended the Wisconsonian glaciation immediately prior to the interglacial we today enjoy. I cannot more be grateful for this discussion that informs my suspicions with understanding.
I am happy that many brighter and better minds than mine
From the discussions I remember having with you, I always considered you a bright mind aswell. Too many bright minds are too cowardly to speak the truths they see, especially in our current times. And while you might be even more contrairian than I am, I think controversial debates are vitally important. Circle Jerking with people you agree with might be nice, to make jokes about the whole situation and laugh, but why would I debate someone that already agrees with me?
This is one of the most important facts "scientists" and "journalists" hide from us. The Earth become greener thanks to CO2.
You may find this research very insightful. Give it a look when you have time for it.
Great resources I will gladly learn from.
Thanks!
Edit: I have long suspected a connection between descriptions in the Mahabharata of the devastating war it recounts and the Younger Dryas that ended the Wisconsonian glaciation immediately prior to the interglacial we today enjoy. I cannot more be grateful for this discussion that informs my suspicions with understanding.
From the discussions I remember having with you, I always considered you a bright mind aswell. Too many bright minds are too cowardly to speak the truths they see, especially in our current times. And while you might be even more contrairian than I am, I think controversial debates are vitally important. Circle Jerking with people you agree with might be nice, to make jokes about the whole situation and laugh, but why would I debate someone that already agrees with me?
I shall have to disappoint you here, and completely agree with you. =p
I know, that was the main reason I stopped debating you ;)
edit: the other reasons were personal stuff in my real life