Welcome to Steem! I wonder if you could clear up some gaps in my understanding of the Q. Above you note that the enemedia are firmly under the control of the intelligence agencies, yet Q constantly claims the NSA are the 'good guys'. We know that the NSA is the SIGINT mechanism these agencies get that data from. It is the NSA that spied on Trump, for example, when Obama's DOJ used lies and fantasy to secure the FISA warrant. It is the NSA that has that function in the US government.
This makes zero sense. The NSA and the CIA are simply two arms of the Executive, and each feeds the other. How can Q claim the NSA is good guys and the CIA bad guys, when they demonstrably are working hand in glove?
Another question is why the accusation that Q is fake/a larp, always refuted, yet the accusation - just as common - that Q is actually simply an arm of the Trump campaign being used to market Trump, never addressed?
Regarding the mockingbird media, I am sure you are familiar with the old adage 'no publicity is bad publicity', and that incessantly attacking Trump is an obvious mechanism to promote him to people that have absolutely lost any trust or confidence in that mockingbird media. So why is this actual promotion of Trump by the enemedia spoken of as if it were really opposition? Obviously, the enemedia destroyed the Ron Paul Campaign in 2008 not by opposing him, but ignoring him completely. That is the actual mechanism which actually harms a candidate - not constantly blaring his name.
When I apply the Hegelian Dialectic to this Q, what falls together is that the two opposing sides of the debate are applied at multiple levels: the NSA vs. the CIA. Trump vs. the Democrats. The 'good guys' or 'white hats' in the military and executive vs. the deep state. In all these cases it looks like people are being manipulated to believe one side or the other - the exact tactic of the Hegelian Dialectic. By opposing two sides against each other and ignoring any other position, people are all but forced to join one or the other. In this matter, who would side with the deep state/CIA, or (amongst Trump voters) the Democrats? This has all the hallmarks of the very manipulation the mockingbird media and deep state are accused of themselves.
One thing I have also noticed about the Q operation is that Israel is hardly ever criticized. Despite that one of the most common refrains I have read from people that follow Q is that Zionism and Israel are using AIPAC to corrupt American government, and most of them incessantly state they believe that, any day now, Trump will reveal his master plan to end that sinister influence. IIRC, Q actually stated they were 'leaving Israel for last'. I also recall George Webb, who admitted to being associated with Mossad, that HRC was betrayed in favor of Trump because she was 'bad for business'. It sure seems they made a good investment in Trump!
Given the Trump administration's practically incestuous links with Israel, his repeated pledges of absolute dedication, the massive amount of aid, his historical links to the Rothschild banking elite (through Wilbur Ross, who personally bailed him out of bankruptcy), and his own family, with his daughter converting to Judaism to marry Jared Kushner, who lent his own bed to Netanyahu when the latter visited them in New York, how is this dichotomy reconciled?
Lastly, when looking back at the campaign promises Trump made, it seems but few of them have been fulfilled, and on immigration - the matter most important to many who strongly supported him - he seems to completely have reversed course. Rather than rein in the police state surveillance he himself suffered, he seems bent on increasing it to the degree possible. Rather than decreasing our participation in foreign military adventurism, he seems, again, to be maximizing it insofar as he can. He's surrounded himself with the most militaristic neocons, from Elliot Abrams, John Bolton, and Mike Pompeo, to 'Bloody' Gina Haspel, and those most bankster of banksters, Wilbur Ross himself, Steve Mnuchin, and so forth. These are seemingly the most deep state of possible cabinet picks, and completely opposite to what he campaigned on. Through it all Q has absolutely maintained the posture that it has all been a setup to drop the deep state to it's knees, when it appears to all intents and purposes that it is the MAGA crew that has been dropped to it's knees at the feet of that very deep state.
I know that's a lot of questions, and you're just getting started out here on Steem, but you wrote such a great article, well sourced and composed, that I hoped you could address all these questions for me. I ask them because it seems to me as if the obvious answer is that Q is apparently an ongoing psyop to keep the Trump train on the tracks by playing the Hegelian Dialectic card, so that the MAGA stop never arrives, and the riders never realize they're not reaching the actual destination they believed they were promised.
Thanks!