The ark of justice may be long. Its definitly bold but maybe the angle over shoots the curve. Right over the heads of all of western civilization. For sure history is a cyclical progression. Is there truely any progress? Same problems keep cropping up every decade. New spins and pawns not issue's or debates. Every generation still arogantly has a few assumption.
We are the most advanced,creative,most free and prosperous. Ignoring all the evidence to the contrary especially when it's on demand or easily available.
We have hijacked the enviromentalist formerly the conservation movement. Turning it into a popularity contest an a moral bludgen. To elavate our selves and people we like. Put down and make less than decisions ,choices and Lifestyles we find distasteful. What is worse now precious time is waisted the planet, her future is at stake. How fitting a demise ? If we have raised the stakes of the love me game to the level of literal and figurative survival ? The novels Hunger games was exhilarating. The point of the life games is to be invited back to play again. Win the battle loose the war is no strategy. Anywhere but fiction books an derranged minds.
Go green is becoming the equivelant of low fat,trans fat,and diet soda. Empty ,meaningless ,over priced label . Maybe a little placebo on the bright side. Destructive,deceptive,reality warping ,sabotage on the other hand. Big buisness and speacial intrest have launched a war to monopolize information. Say what you will the public loses out. The proof is in the puding. Consumer protection agency,better buisness Bureau, all orwellian. The message "I got from Sun Tzu's Art of War control your opposition". If you gleefully utter utterance about consumer this or that. Then its already beyond the pale. Consumption units are antithetical to human beings in existence.
A Pyrrhic victory (/ˈpɪrɪk/ (About this sound listen) PIRR-ik) is a victory that inflicts such a devastating toll on the victor that it is tantamount to defeat. Someone who wins a Pyrrhic victory has also taken a heavy toll that negates any true sense of achievement.
I would suggest reading up on Derreck Jensen. He understands still waters runs deep. Have to have strong roots. We reap what we sow. Several hundred other anologies and sayings. Meaning from good stalk. Well rounded ,blanced,just,hard working,homegrown,litany of other compliments. The better angels of our nature,how its cultivating us,yet we believe the latter. Thats the best I can muster phenomenal man prophetically speaking of old wisdom. A true conservative heart. If only conservative thought and ethic's translated into good policy perscriptions. We could bring on the Marxsist puritanical revolution. " I would hop on that bandwagon in a heartbeat. General Mao Zedong in the Confederacy be damned.
Marijuana legalization is a Trojan horse. If i got my tongue cut out tomorow. ** I would get a tattoo saying look for the doublethink and doublespeak**. "Good thing I have a huge mug.
*Vertical integration*
In microeconomics and management, vertical integration is an arrangement in which the supply chain of a company is owned by that company. Usually each member of the supply chain produces a different product or (market-specific) service, and the products combine to satisfy a common need. It is contrasted with horizontal integration, wherein a company produces several items which are related to one another. Vertical integration has also described management styles that bring large portions of the supply chain not only under a common ownership, but also into one corporation (as in the 1920s when the Ford River Rouge Complex began making much of its own steel rather than buying it from suppliers).
Vertical integration and expansion is desired because it secures the supplies needed by the firm to produce its product and the market needed to sell the product. Vertical integration and expansion can become undesirable when its actions become anti-competitive and impede free competition in an open marketplace. Vertical integration is one method of avoiding the hold-up problem. A monopoly produced through vertical integration is called a "vertical monopoly" Simply put corporate owned legal cartel.
Franchising is based on a marketing concept which can be adopted by an organisation as a strategy for business expansion. Where implemented, a franchiser licenses its know-how, procedures, intellectual property, use of its business model, brand; and rights to sell its branded products and services to a franchisee. In return the franchisee pays certain fees and agrees to comply with certain obligations, typically set out in a Franchise Agreement.
The word "franchise" is of Anglo-French derivation—from franc, meaning free—and is used both as a noun and as a (transitive) verb.[1] For the franchiser, use of a franchise system is an alternative business growth strategy, compared to say expansion through corporate owned outlets or "chain stores". Adopting a franchise system business growth strategy for the sale and distribution of goods and services minimizes the franchiser's capital investment and liability risk.
Thirty-three countries have laws that explicitly regulate franchising, with the majority of all other countries having laws which have a direct or indirect effect on franchising.[2] Franchising is also used as a foreign market entry
I.e Putting the name trump on building or stake .
Charging the sucker who thought that logo was cool. Almost always products of are lower-quality materials slave mined or assembled globally transported.
In economics, marginal cost is the change in the opportunity cost that arises when the quantity produced is incremented by one unit, that is, it is the cost of producing one more unit of a good.[1] Intuitively, marginal cost at each level of production includes the cost of any additional inputs required to produce the next unit. At each level of production and time period being considered, marginal costs include all costs that vary with the level of production, whereas other costs that do not vary with production are considered fixed. For example, the marginal cost of producing an automobile will generally include the costs of labor and parts needed for the additional automobile and not the fixed costs of the factory that have already been incurred. In practice, marginal analysis is segregated into short and long-run cases, so that, over the long run, all costs (including fixed costs) become marginal
There is a new buzz word going around. 0marginal costs. This is slavery and its not new look at any so called economist of America late 16th early 17th century. Say explicitly alot of land get slaves. A lot of people force them to get a wage. I digress back to the trojan horse.
Corporate America and politicians did not suddenly see the light. Heretics with money seized an opportunity. convert the peace pipe into The profit pipe for the Millennial era. Have to make up for those declining Tobacco liquor and pharmaceutical sales. Think this is conspiracy if you want. Dabs already have butane in it. You smoke it like methamphetamine . A split hair away from altering the chemical composition itself. Barriers to entry no Mom and Pop on a plot of land regenerating soil. Either mass production with hydroponics in a warehouse in a controlled environment. Clear cutting and annihilating everything to Mono crop. Part 2 comming soon if anybody reads this my gratitude eternally
Please comment let me know if you want the rest thanx again