The more these creators plaster their work everywhere, and take from systems that require money coming in as well in order to stay afloat, while not attracting paying consumers, the more likely they are to destroy each platform they use. They're setting themselves up to be deplatformed. Money out, with no money in is unsustainable. With decentralized media, one must build from the ground up, on their own. The money itself doesn't care about fame. Once they build, they can no longer fall prey to things like 'cancel culture' and all these other problems we see when dealing with central authority (deplatformed, demonetized, etc.)
Fame doesn't mean shit around here. The most famous human in the world can arrive but if they don't attract their own sources of income, but get voted heavily, all they're doing is taking, while the platform below crumbles.
Maybe as a consumer, you're only concerned about the information. The content creator is creating, for money.
Without bringing his own market/fans/followers, this guy is just some dude creating content, like millions of other people. Maybe their market puts them high on a pedestal and thinks they're larger than life, but once outside the echo chamber, it's a totally different story. The whole point of fame though, is to make money. Fame without money flowing in is like that guy downtown everyone knows to avoid because he's just going to make a scene.
If you prefer content creators treat this platform like they would twitter, that's fine. No amount of arguing with me will change how I feel about this.
P.S. One positive review doesn't impress me. People can buy those these days.
P.P.S. I actually like some of this dude's work. Not so much once he started leaning more towards tabloid journalism, but some of his earlier stuff was great. I arrived to this post as a consumer, and left feeling ripped off.