You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Warrior girl

in #ntopaz5 years ago

I feel this is really unfair and maybe some reason behind all of this that only I get such accusations.

---> you said this but you're doing the same to me o_o;;

                         
I'm not sure why you used me as the only example because I don't post my art without improving them in some way, but I guess I'm the unlucky one. Hopefully the next time my name is tagged it will be in a better circumstance, because right now I feel that you use me as your solo example because you don't like me :o.
                         
Anyway, obviously I don't feel that I have done anything wrong, but I understand that some people will appreciate it if I put more description about my artworks so they can decide whether they want to support me or not. That is fine with me, I will try to make it clearer for my future posts :).
                         

Sort:  

This is victim bullying 101, they don’t like being questioned so they tear down others while playing victim. Don’t let it get you down. People always show their true colors eventually...

@scrawly the comment in question is on another post of yanes94.

https://steemit.com/ntopaz/@llfarms/re-yanes94-re-llfarms-re-yanes94-ntopaz--yanes94--493151157--ntopaz-drawing-ocd-resteem-illustration-art--2019-02-06-18-30-11--artwork--none-20190208t005704350z

Please note that this is a digital work based on an older ink sketch from three months ago. And I think that’s why Yanes used your posts as an example. It has nothing to do with bullying or being a victim.
The idea that making a digital drawing and showing it after some months that the sketch was done and showing it, to be labeled as an old and unoriginal is beyond weird.

I don't feel bullied or feeling victimised, but I don't see why she picked me out of the blue as the only example. As you can see, I wasn't part of this conversation.

Perhaps she likes your work and it just popped into her head as an example 🤷‍♀️ I don’t post my art on Steem anymore but I’m concerned that curators try to dictate what illustrators are supposed to write (considering the work is authentic).

Actually you have no idea why she was mentioned, but I do. So please, if you want to curate with someone else’s project on things like this, as you are a trained art expert, continue.

The bullying and manipulation will not be tolerated though, which I’m sure you know nothing about as you are jumping in here without any facts.

I stand by the words I’ve said, like I said.. your feedback was noted though.

Indeed I have no idea what’s happening nor actually care about the internal things between people. My comment is only about the production of art. 99% of professional artists use references, projectors, light tables, some use photoshop to collage photos then print them out onto watercolor paper and then ink or paint over them. They only disclose the way they produce the work when asked directly. These are just modern tools of the trade of the age of mass production and mass demand.

@scrawly nothing‘s wrong with posting improvement posts or repost so I think ALL your posts are good, I love your art and I have curated many of them. I posted your links here as examples for reference only, nothing against you, and I also want to show that Llfarm’s is being unfair with her accusations while other artists and friends do the same.