I've always thought Q was a psyop.....just as I've always thought Trump was a chosen puppet (another Psyop)....same as Obama always was. The Deep State (CIA/Mossad/CFR) simply choose the characters....the puppets. All the worlds a stage. Looks like the Powers That Be are now using the QAnon Psyop to discredit those who seek the truth, and they've employed obvious shill Mike Rothschild of the Daily Dot to do the honors of tearing down that which they themselves built up. His role denotes even more so that it was all along a Psyop, same as Trump himself is a Psyop. All is divide and conquer, an elaborate show. Simply ask Qui Bono (who benefits) and follow the money, as always.
Posts and links:
Link to Daily Dot article now being used to discredit QAnon followers and the truth community as a whole. -
https://amp.dailydot.com/layer8/qanon-failed-predictions/
For the real truth, look here:
Its is unvarnished and raw, it is not connected to any political party or tied up in some misleading movement built upon false hopes. It is that which stares us in the face. It is western government officials support for terrorists. It is on both sides of the political aisle. It is murderous and disgusting. It is being orchestrated by our leaders in the US....I'll state it once again..... on both sides of the political aisle. Trump's Nikki Haley and Heather Nauert were part of it. John McCain was part of it. Obama was part of it. Clinton was part of it........the entire CFR affiliated mainstream media was part of it. Numerous think tanks including AIPAC, WINEP, Brookings, AEI, The Heritage Foundation, etc.......were part of it. NGO's were part of it. They are all involved and incredibly corrupted. That is the real harsh reality. Kissinger whispers in Trumps ear while the media plays the public fiddle for fools.
Exposing the White Helmets : Collated Video Evidence of Terrorist Collusion - Over 50 Video Clips
One I never fell for for a single second.
Didn't you say President Trump is a hero of the free world last week?
If I did I was out of my mind, blind drunk, smoking crack while injecting heroin.
Sounds like a good time!
You know it bro. Now back to my magic shrooms.
Curated for #informationwar (by @commonlaw)
Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 8,000 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.
Join our discord and chat with 200+ fellow Informationwar Activists.
Join our brand new reddit! and start sharing your Steemit posts directly to The_IW!
Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call Pt 11
Ways you can help the @informationwar
Of COURSE QAnon IS a psyop.
It's just that you, I, and everyone else IS NOT the target.
Q has posted numerous times about disinformation being necessary. Not because the aim is to misinform the people paying attention, but to give information that the targets will read, expecting a certain move forces them to make a counter move.
Also, since so much of the information war never touches headlines, there's no real solid accounting of what was good vs bad "predictions"...
Like in chess, just because you make a move that puts a piece at risk does not mean that there ever was the intention to take the piece, but to force the opponent into protecting that piece, which opens up the defenses for the real attack.
There are plenty of people that support Trump that didn't buy into the QAnon phenomena. There is a false assumption here that QAnon support and Trump support are the same thing. That is not the case. There is indeed a number of people that support Trump that also bought into QAnon. If you were to do a Venn diagram I suspect that pretty much all QAnon supporters/believers/followers were also Trump supporters, yet there would be a far larger amount of people outside of that overlap that don't buy into QAnon. I know a number of people bought into it early on and then some things changed and they no longer did. There are allegations that QAnon was hijacked many months ago. Compelling allegations. That is when a lot of people stopped supporting them.
I didn't vote for Trump. I actually don't think he is at all like Obama. He has been under unprecedented attack. I do think he has been used as a tool by the same people though. He is surrounded by them. He has acted upon false and bad intel. Example: The strikes against Syria over bogus/false flag gas attack nonsense. Or the skripal Novacek gas nonsense where no one died. He is only human, and he is surrounded by exactly the people that you are hinting at. He'd have to be super human to know when info is false or true. He has often placed his trust in the wrong parties. He still does. I truly don't think anyone could truly operate free of this corruption in the office now.
Though if it is a psyop then with the unprecedented and incredibly biased attacks against him (Obama isn't remotely in the same ballpark in this regard, he had tons of support rather than attacks, he still does) then if he was intended to be in there their agenda clearly must be to collapse trust in everything and increase division. If that is their goal it is working.
I've always thought that he was popular with them because they thought no one in their right mind would vote for someone who talks like him, thus why they put so much emphasis on "grab them by the pussy" and such. It'd scare people into voting for the incredibly corrupt Hillary.
Thus, the mental break down and insanity that ensued immediately after he won. I don't see indications that was the plan at all.
Though he is surrounded by people that are definitely manipulating him. Thus with the false intel and manipulation he is often being the puppet. I don't believe that was the plan in this case.
I haven't liked how he has handled Syria and a number of other things, but at the same time I've been very impressed with what he has actually managed to do given the insane never before seen set of circumstances that the last two years have been.
Though I personally am one of those that never bought into the whole QAnon thing. I often viewed it a lot like Astrology, or Tarot cards. Throw enough possibilities out there and let the people interpret it how they want. It lends the idea of prophecy and knowledge when really it was casting a lot of vague data that could be easily interpreted as being some genius insight when some of the bait managed to fit a mental narrative.
I also am aware that the craziness of the day is happening all over the world at the moment, so it is not just a Trump thing. Though that is what the propaganda clearly wants us to focus on.
Who controls the propaganda?
Not Trump.
Who is censoring?
Not Trump.
Fair points; the main one that I would like to address is the Syria attack.
This one PROVES Q as a legitimate intel source.
So, Trump announces the plan to withdraw; the next day the chemical attack, and the Q post about Trump never telegraphing moves.
After the attack, Britain and France threatened to attack with or without Trump. The attempt being to force NATO into conflict with Russia, this would legally force Trump into military action.
Meaning, Trump was forced into action or he would be forced into potential WW3 level military action.
So, he tweets about smart missiles, russia withdraws from the impact area, and most missiles got shot down.
The next day is where it became clear that it was a double cross;
It was such a massive move that even the media didn't even call for Trumps impeachment for 2 days after. They were so taken aback by how they got played that they didn't even know how to spin things....
No it doesn't. Also this occurred before Q was allegedly hijacked. A lot of people think Q was legit for awhile and then it was taken over by a different group. The problem with a secret group is it is totally possible this happened. It also might not have happened and we wouldn't know.
Q hasn't been so accurate with what has been going on in the last few weeks. Also my Tarot, and Astrology points stand. Throw enough darts that are vague and people will do the knitting of them into something that might make sense. It is a time tested technique.
I do think there seemed to be something to that initial group back during the time of the earlier Syria attacks. Though they haven't been nearly as accurate and a lot more vague. Often they have been completely wrong. They were not wrong that I saw before the alleged switching of controllers happened.
You know when Q was "hijacked"?? Coincidentally it happened RIGHT AFTER Q posted about being careful who to follow, that people were seeking profit from the movement.
The response to that post by Corsi, Jones, and a few others was to start claiming that Q was hijacked, Jones went so far as to claim he had "met Q" (No outside comms) and then that he had his "own Real Q" (Zach).
The Q group had obviously anticipated the attacks because they posted another photo from AF1 in the air that was taken seconds after one that was posted months earlier.
The point was never about being "accurate"...It is a group hinting at the elements of a general plan, NOT a specific iteration of what moves will be played and in what order. If they did that, then it would just be a matter of solving the clues and they could completely destroy the plan.
There was no "second group"... that was something started by people who outed themselves as profiteers.
Keep in mind not everyone around the president is a good actor. Showing such a photo is not evidence for or against the alleged hijacking of the Q movement. As I said before that is one of the problems with being completely anonymous. We literally cannot know.
I'm not much of a "faith" type person.
EDIT: Also I wasn't ignoring you. I flew out of country for a few days and only got back last night.
Agreed... Trump, especially from the start, has had a large segment of bad actors around him.
I think your point of anonymity is valid, makes it so there's no way to confirm or deny with 100%.
The main point I was making was that the people who claimed Q group was taken over or whatever, are those people who have been pointed at by Q as being paytriots, people who were trying to profit off the movement.
The problem here is that is a generalization. Those are not the only people saying that. Making categorical assumptions about a group of people based upon the traits of a few or even a lot of the members is generally false. Aka a Generalization, a stereotype is a form of that.
I push back, because I know the vast majority of generalizations are false.
Q was being allowed while many other credible sources were not - another clue that it was either a psyop to begin with, or would be used to discredit others at some point.
Psyop? Certainly. Malevolent or benevolent is the question. The only thing keeping me on the fence is the now 61,000+ sealed cases at the federal level. Is the swamp being drained, or taken over?
Frankly, I still think Hillary is going down if only because she provided absolutely zero return on investment for the five billion dollars of other peoples' money she spent on her joke of a campaign
I just noticed the upvotes and it brought me here to this great article. Thanks @clarityofsignal. Def was a psy-op. Connections are clear. A few of His buddies ran Q.
Anyhoo...here is that article I promised to link arabisouri in:
https://steemit.com/culturewar/@canusapatriots/news-aggregator-for-patriots-brett-farve-uss-liberty-migration-updates-soros-steemit-patriots-petition-vs-gcm