You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Community Poll: Is the HBD Stabilizer "Experiment" Worth Cutting All But a Single Developers DHF Funding? EDIT

in #pole3 years ago

I mentioned this in the chat, and I don't know if you picked it up: Beyond the short term term, loading the barrels of the DHF while it's raining money might make stakeholders more willing to liberally spend on development.

Sort:  

Interesting take on it. I'd briefly considered this as the cause behind it all.. But any wealth potentially accumulated by this course of action could be completely wiped given a bit of market support receding or if some dormant large stake holder decides to say fuck it and take us down some significant price percentage.

That would be fucking cool if this ends up resulting in more projects being supported via DHF in the future, in fact that is the best outcome possible from this.. But it's entirely up to the top tiers to make this happen, and frankly I'm completely unsure if the development community is going to wait around in hopes of future support or migrate to more active communities.

Hard to say.. Either way it seems teh course followed currently is a gamble of sorts, or perhaps a test of the community to see exactly what actions can be taken before you see mass exodus. I don't honestly know, nor did when I was talking with the top tiers receive their Occams Razor justification behind it other than: "HBD is overpriced, HIVE holders (largest stake holders) should benefit from this rather than the ecosystem builders"..

Stabilizer could have been multiple developers following the exact same market pumping path effectivelyt doing Stabilizers job while also retaining your developer support.. But ultimately it boils down to the ability to govern what happens not resting with the community.. And that is the part that ultimately lead me to this thought experiment..

Also that is a hell of a gamble on a "might" effect which ultimately may never happen. :(

It's been my observation that in the past few months, stakeholders have been more willing to fund projects and take chances with proposals. And spending has been more liberal. With a higher supply, I think the door is wider now.