As I wrote in another comment, I don't doubt for a second that many (perhaps even most) trans people would also reject the attention whores who claim to represent them. Yet, somehow these issues are gaining the attention of those at the highest levels of governments, who are attempting to pass tyrannical legislation that hold dire ramifications for all of us.
It would have been great to see at least a few trans people who oppose these laws also have their say at these hearings. And I'm sure many would be perfectly willing to do so. However, just like with the "man made climate change" issues, the politicos only invite those who support the arbitrary legislation they're trying to ram through, and actively work to block those who would offer any "difference of opinion" that would debunk and reveal how truly outrageous their positions actually are.
Luckily for the rest of us, Jordan Peterson seems to be a one-man small army in that regard, which is why the regressive "powers that be" try so hard to denounce him as a "racist bigoted whack job". This, of course, is their "calling card" for pretty much anyone who doesn't wholeheartedly buy into all their bullshit.
I don't think they are, I think they are getting paid to pretend there's an interest same as people in the media are paid to talk about the subject often.
I think the goal is just to make people uncomfortable so they will focus on this as opposed to something else going on at the same time.
Every time you see the trans subject being heavily discussed watch out, look around, something else is going on and the controversy dealers are trying to get you to miss it.
I also have a feeling this topic may be what they're trying to "misdirect" on a global scale...
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/corruption/nunes-memo-is-out
https://steemit.com/news/@nikflossus/world-war-news-twitter-bots-framing-a-diversionary-narrative-as-we-speak
Good share, especially about the social media manipulation. The sad thing is after the patriot act there's no such thing as abusing surveillance or abuse in general.
that's certainly likely as well, but the thing is that these laws are getting passed nonetheless, and people are being prosecuted over them, and these "laws" are being debated out at the Senate level, after they've become law.
so perhaps the real question is, if the "powers that be" need to misdirect people using such extreme tyrannical nonsense, what nefarious activities are they really trying to cover up...
Link: British Prosecutors Charging Hate Crimes for just saying “All right Geezer.”
Maybe that's what people need to start asking themselves and others next time we get bombarded with stuff that is supposedly causing outrage.
They go with the trans subject because they know people will pay attention, when people stop paying attention they'll just go with another subject.
It's like abortion and gay marriage, every time they wanted people distracted they'd bring it up but they've used those subjects so much that it hardly has an effect now. It's not like people have a say about what is presented in the news, remember Occupy Wall Street? Like a month went by before the news even mentioned something was going on.
Honestly I don't know what they're trying to cover up right now but I'm more concerned about government demanding disclosure of transfers made by people associated to Bitconnect within the last 90 days and orders to halt any crypto transfers until they say so. While I do think those involved should pay for knowingly tricking others, I don't think gov intervention is a good idea for the precedents they can create.