There is a difference between using tools to improve, and abusing tools. There are many great ways to use AI, including brainstorming for idea generation, in-depth research providing drill-down analysis of complex subjects, language improvement by providing feedback on grammar and syntax, organizing etc. There are all kinds of people in the world, some will choose ai to do great things, and others will abuse it and try to cut corners to game the system. Luckily AI can help us locate users that are abusing it, and if we are able to locate these types of bad actors then we can simply send them a message and let them know our position. On hive the message can also be included with a flag. If we think a user is overpaid and abusing ai then it is well within our right to use our stake to issue a flag.
As for bullying, we don't do that. What do bullies do? They force people to do things that they don't want to. Bullies steal, cheat, lie, and continuously harass. We do none of this. We do not put anyone on a blacklist and are very forgiving, and if we make a mistake we own up to it. We just had a case today about plagiarism that turned out to be false, so we took the flag away and issued an apology. We are not out to get anyone, we're here to help the community. Look at our track record, nearly everyone we flagged for ai admitted it so far.
Thanks for sharing your opinion, I can see where you are coming from, but assure you that bullying is not our intent at all.
Dude, I saw what you have done with @teukumukhlis. Okay, the man spoke of his experience and used AI to improve the phrasing but you just decided to downvote him. Guess what? That's what non-English natives do, use tools because if they spoke in their native tongues there would be no one reading and if they let their You just took the post and put it through your little GPT Zero and decided to downvote it.
Guess what you didn't downvote though. asgharali's post which actually shows this if you run through GBT Zero
In fact, you upvoted that one even though GBT Zero says the same thing about it that it did about @teukumukhlis' post. You also can't be a curation project and do this at the same time as there's a clear conflict of interest as evidenced in the example above. Another example is this aliakbar2 post
You, HW, and hive.defender are definitely not equipped to handle this matter properly and the last thing anyone should do is give you more power. When you lot have a better plan to combat posts fully written by AI, we could talk. If you don't have a definitive way to tell whether people are using AI to improve their posts, grammar check, or better present their thoughts and people who use it to just generate AI content then withdraw from the conversation and don't go around telling people what tool to use and how to use it.
Exactly.
Listen, I understand what you're all trying to do and I respect the goal, but the means you're going about it is wrong. You're playing Russian Roulette with people's livelihoods.