Is not about who write most but who write good content in the community
Respectfully, I do not agree. I curate a lot. I also miss a lot. Now and again, I'll see a wonderful article (to me anyway) that was beyond the 7-day mark that I missed. I would have loved to give high votes to those and am sad they got little rewards. It happens.
It's also about exposure too. The people with the most followers, in my opinion, might not produce the best content. These guys are the ones with the most TRUSTED content. If you trust the content someone produces, you might be more likely to give higher votes for them. You might even ignore other articles to pursue the work of author that you're most familiar with.
This is true for everyone who curates.
Personally in the case that I think a post I wrote needs more exposure I will promote that post @null. A few months ago I wouldn't consider self promotion but here it helps everyone if when I really work at something that I can make it known to curators.
@ajanaku, mineopoly has a great point and it's something I don't normally discuss. I will always save a portion of my liquid for post promotions on Ecency, PeakD, Hive, and POB or whatever tribe account I use. I can tell you from my perspective that use of the promotion feature works.
When I said is not about who write most ,I did not mean if you write more post you won't be upvoted but I mean when you are writing post make it meaningful post ,don't just write because you are going to be upvoted
It's only few people that can create a content with no motive of getting curated even I do create contains mostly for the hope of being curated.
That is why I hardly post but instead of posting many content that are not quality I will rather take my time and create a meaningful content and make it quality
Thank you for clearing up my confusion. You and mineopoly are certainly correct in this regard.
I just love the way you always interact with us ,you are true leader