Proportional votes will be better for everyone except those trying to maximize their returns by pitting lowest above average bids which is bad for you, your frontrunners and your higher bidders.
The criteria should be like to get frontrunners' votes bid should be > 0.5*average bid and then it gets votes in the same proportion the bid gets compared to the other frontrunners votes receivers (those satisfying the criterion in the same round).
This way the frontrunners' voting quota will not dwindle and before enacting it they should be recharged to 100%.
Since I got a big vote I do not deserve a full refund, but a partial refund for me and the rest would be nice.
The size of the portion should be proportional to the bids, and this way the rest of the bidders would get a partial refund too.
Maybe a 50% refund for all.
Not full refund for anyone, but proportional refunds for all.
Minnowbooster enforces a similar (not identical) policy.
They have other problems, like not maintaining a voting quota discipline.
A bidding bot should always recharge to 100% or at least above 99.9% before starting a round. In this aspect and other, but not all aspects, you are good.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
This comment has received a 22.98 % upvote from @steemdiffuser thanks to: @stimialiti. Steem on my friend!
Above average bids may get additional upvotes from our trail members!
Get Upvotes, Join Our Trail, or Delegate Some SP