You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The 5G "Internet of Things" and its Death Towers Must Not be Allowed to Happen !

in #science6 years ago (edited)

Have you watched the videos I have shared here @atomicpower ?? This is not fearmongerting at all, the nefaste effects of this technology are provable with science and even recorded ! Why is it this leaves you impartial saying such a benign thing as " technology is to be embraced " ! Nuclear fission was technology in its day ! So you think that too should have been embraced ?? There are hundreds of thousands of Japanese I am sure that would disagree with you !

Sort:  

Yes i absolutely think nuclear fission should be embraced In terms of energy production. We would all be better off with cheaper cleaner energy and people who are worried about spontaneously combusting are the same people who make it impossible for nuclear energy to become reality.

Nuclear energy already is a reality, ask the whales in the Pacific Ocean they will tell you what they think of your cheap and clean energy !! So moving back to the topic of my post then @atomicpower, after watching the videos I have taken time to share here, do you also think then that this 5G "revolution" is a good thing for mankind ? That we should embrace it too ??

Nuclear energy is held back 1000 fold because people don't know what it is, or how it works, and so they fear it.

Should i be scared of 5g because of a video of whay happens to metal in a microwave? The answer is no. Faster internet speeds for everyone is only going to make our society run more efficiently and effectively and so yes i fully support the upgrade to 5g.

And i ask you, and everyone else reading this, to learn the basics of nuclear science so that you can understand the risks of radiation and the rewards of an abundance of clean reliable energy.

Did you try to put a meat into microwave oven? Did you see any combustion?
I'm not... So why should I explode being exposed to radiation from 5G Tower?

meat ordinarily does not contain heavy metals so this clearly rarely happens ! But somebody who had experienced years of breathing heavy metals released into the atmosphere in chemtrails might not react in the same way as the metal present would be at least problematic if not fatal !! I am not saying this is a fact or do I have proof for this ! I am merely connecting the two great programs of the Agenda 21 depopulation program to show how indeed they might be related and be two parts of one plan, namely to kill 97 percent of the population of the planet by 2050 !

Heavy metals concentration exceeds recommended maximum in fish, meat, etc in Saudi Arabia markets

If I got your point correctly, you mean that muscles is not the main organs where HM condense to. Am I right? The bones is the last resort of HM?

Any way, chicken goes to MW oven with bones. I don't believe Heavy Metals can condense into solid veins of conductor to make possible to explode or make fatal electric surges in a very high freq EM field.

Well I grant you that there is nothing on the internet which officially backs up my claim ! But then why would they point this out ? I was merely pointing out the possible connection between the introduction of heavy metals which you have to admit are cumulative in our bodies into our food and the air we breathe ! But that aside, the other numerous and proven by science physical amd mental effects speak for themselves and are reason enough to say know to this " improvement in convenience for data transfer " they call 5G !

The radiation is always a danger, but it don't kill as directly. Except for cases of extreme radiation levels like on atomic stations.

At some level there could be a damage to DNA and other low-level damages.
But stay cool and dig for numbers, comrade! Then analyze... :)

Some atomic power stations do have vey high radiating areas but they are contained. Coal plants actually emit more radiation than nuclear plants do.

I am merely connecting the two great programs of the Agenda 21 depopulation program to show how indeed they might be related and be two parts of one plan, namely to kill 97 percent of the population of the planet by 2050 !

Why someone can have a goal to kill 97% of people?!
The more overcrowded cities, the less the price of Man-Hour. The richest individuals, who have resources to build such distributed weapon, won't do building it, because it will destroy cheapest working power.

No they dont need human beings now, they have put there future firmly into the hands of Robots which will serve their production and service needs ! Have you read U.N Agenda 21 ? YOu maybe should to know the reasoning they have !

Sorry.. TL;DR yet... But interested...
Could you please share some essential pieces / ideas what U.N is planning to convert Earth into a Vulcan homeworld?

They are planing on turning this planet into a High Tech Newl Eden built by them for them, and not for us ! These people see themselves as the decendants of the Eygptian Pharoahs and we were of use back then, but not now as they have their robots to do their work and bidding !By the time this plan comes to fruition we will be for the better part long gone ! With just a few enclaves left of slave citezens to serve them as they please ! No doubt the prettiest of selected females and men for their own personal pleasure !

OK.. got it. Thanks