RE: 스팀 21하드포크는 실패작이었습니다. 21하드포크 제안자들은 더이상 나대지 말았으면 합니다.(Steem 21 Hard fork was a failure. 21Hard fork propositions don't want to go off any more.)

[kopasi]

a는 하루에 11번 큐레이션 합니다.
b는 하루에 100번 큐레이션 합니다.

a의 큐레이션 보상이 b의 큐레이션 보상보다 많습니다.

이것은 잘못된것입니다.

A curates 11 times a day.
B curates 100 times a day.

A has more curation compensation than b.

This is wrong.

Comments

[dalz]

Here what steemworld says about curation rewards.

a. @smooth = 1012 (1.03M SP)

[e-mail] = 1913 (1.7M SP)

[smooth]

Rewards vary over time so probably different time windows being looked at here.

[dalz]

Have you considered voting on authors who have set null as beneficiary for a share of their reward?

[smooth]

I have and I do vote for some of those. However, I feel that usually burning rewards is the best result for Steem at this time.

[dalz]

It can promote authors to set null as beneficiary and spread more.
Also bid bods accepting promotion only from authors who have set null as beneficiary will be a real burn to promote.

[smooth]

Correct