RE: Never Forget: Sept 2001 = SIX Events!

[tommycordero]

It took me 15 years to realize there weren't even planes. I fear they are going to get away with this because the lie is so ridiculous people would have a hard time ever getting around it. It's like one doesn't know where to start because everything is so crazy. Like it just baffles the mind to think how anyone could come up with a lie so obvious, it fucks with the brain so much I guess it can start believing is not a lie because it's too out there.

Comments

[jasoncarswell]

Thanks for your comment.

9-11 is just the beginning - there are SOOO many more lies out there.
I tried not to delve into debatable points but that might be debatable.

I don't believe there were planes at Shanksville or the Pentagon.

I'm not dismissing it but I'm really not convinced there weren't (modified) planes at the towers. Can you please share or point to your best evidence. I don't buy the hologram theory when holograms would be used in more everyday applications other than resurrecting Tupac or Michael Jackson. Most pilots will tell you passenger jets can't fly that fast so low. Maybe it was on the verge of breaking up. Maybe it was a drone flight. Maybe it was heavily modified.

Two details you may already know:

1. Special agents seem to have dropped off a busted up jet-engine on a Manhattan corner - for the wrong type of aircraft = planted evidence. The "planes?" and most of the buildings were utterly pulverized and demolished in the controlled explosions leaving not much of anything, any body, or any evidence (which was hastily shipped to China despite not being cost-effective).
2. There were countless videos and photographs of the events and planes. High definition television was in it's infancy so the video is all sub-par. Despite these countless photographs, NONE of the airplane photos were good quality telephoto pictures of any substantial quality. Considering that every journalist in NYC (media central) that found out about the first strike had ample time to get their camera, telephoto or otherwise, trained on the events. It just seems too remarkably suspicious.

[tommycordero]

The first time I saw someone suggest planes weren't involved I even got pissed off, I thought that was one of the people who gave a negative rep to those seeking the truth, maybe even a shill. But a few months later, when I was less upset, I took the time to re-watch those videos and couldn't longer deny it. This was the first video I sat down to watch with an open mind and open eyes:

[jasoncarswell]

Thanks for the link. I'll give that another honest open-minded look but I've seen so much other material I doubt I'll change my mind. I recall early on, over a decade ago, when people would present eye-witness testimonies but I had trouble believing "bombs" went off. Now, of course, it's all sooo obvious by comparison, physics, evidence, and oodles of surrounding circumstantial coincidences. Of course some are corrupted infiltrator plants to sell their version while others are legitimate eyewitness civilians - from police to firemen to people on the street to across in New Jersey. I even recall a patriotic woman saying something like, "that was no American plane." Many people didn't see either plane because they may not have been in a position to or weren't expecting it. Many people claim they did see a plane, legit or otherwise. Even the DC eyewitnesses can't get their stories aligned regarding the path of the jet that flew over the Pentagon.

I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm only saying I'm skeptical of everything and I'm not convinced yet.

[lovejoy]

Holy smokes... That's pretty compelling, I hadn't seen this before.