I see that from launch, it's immutable. I want it to be mutatable, I guess that's out of the cards.
Not sure if example two of multi-token forum support answers my questions.
I think that we should very clearly avoid all references to pegs to real-world currencies, especially the USD, both with SBDs as they are now and hypothetical future tokens in example 5. The reasons should be clear, and pegs are terrible and always fail, or rather, whichever currency can absorb the damage more will win.
Votable and advisory information is interesting, but doesn't answer my questions...
Well, at least we can re-issue icos in series.
I'd already skimmed over this before, skimmed over it again. I guess my questions are really more suggestions, because the current answer to most of them would be no, but they said they were asking us what we'd like to see in smts, so I figured I'd ask.
A workaround in all cases (or in some cases preferable solution) is to airdrop a version 2 token to all holders of the version 1 token on a 1:1 basis. Assuming the changes are viewed by the community as a clear improvement then most in not all value/interest/activity should migrate to the new token.
And the original tokens would be deprecated by their general disuse by a soft consensus of the majority? That's actually a pretty good workaround, and much less of a hassle as far as how much a technical timesink/safety risk doing it hardcoded or allowing such on the blockchain would be. Makes sense, thanks!
Exactly.