By the way, 20 cents is coming soon, slowly but surely. I am in the midst of doing a little thought experiment about the rate of supply at the beginning of a currency and the destabilising effects different regimes have, and trying to find one that has a minimal destabilisation effect.
I think it's an inverse square.
But the point I am prefixing this with is about the fact that Steem's parameters have very suddenly reduced the supply rate and non-supply dependent factors are suddenly a lot less affected by newly issued Steem and more affected by buying and selling.
I think the supply now is outpaced by the network effects leading to the ratio of sellers versus buyers, by not a huge amount, maybe 0.1% a day or so, but since HF 0.16 I am now seeing a slight upward trend and I think it is because the parameters have been brought into line with the causes of the activity leading to more sell than buy.
I made the decision to put your account on cheetah's automatic comment downvoting list (not posts, just comments) because I saw your STEEM price bot was still making comments in vaguely related but not really related posts. It looked pretty pointless and spammy to me. You suddenly bringing up your disagreement with the subjective value of my posts right afterwards was kinda funny. Anyway, it's good to see you're personally invested and care enough about Steem to share your opinions. !cheetah unreplyban
You do realise you've let everyone know in advance you're crashing the currency right? :P someone's going to know your coming and they'll buy steem up cheap.
Oh wait yes, my bad, I remember him complaining about this guy, but that's a good thing I'd say, if the steem is going into the market that means he can't fiddle with things as much anymore.
I just had three of them on my posts and comments and at the third one I started to understand what it was and asked @matrixdweller if he was testing a bot.
Personally, I would never let a bot loose on the blockchain without strong limits on who it pesters to start with. Even, I might just make it produce a log of where it would have posted if I enabled it to do so, just to watch what it's doing.
The High Guardians of Steem have an interest in not letting the chain get filled with low value data. Some of them might be said to be overzealous. If you didn't notice that and go playing around with things that might interest them you should have been paying more attention.
I thought it was cool too, but it's the wrong approach to rolling it out.
I don't make it my business to check up on other people but you put stuff on my posts 3 times before this incident you speak of and I was starting to maybe think about getting annoyed.
So I do know something of what I am talking about and I am more subtle in the way I try to alert you to what is going on. You remember the comment I made in response to one, maybe it was the day before yesterday. I was also suggesting by what I said that maybe you were being to exhuberant in letting your bot cut in on people's discussions.
This post has been ranked within the top 80 most undervalued posts in the first half of Jan 23. We estimate that this post is undervalued by $2.88 as compared to a scenario in which every voter had an equal say.
Flagged as trolling
By the way, 20 cents is coming soon, slowly but surely. I am in the midst of doing a little thought experiment about the rate of supply at the beginning of a currency and the destabilising effects different regimes have, and trying to find one that has a minimal destabilisation effect.
I think it's an inverse square.
But the point I am prefixing this with is about the fact that Steem's parameters have very suddenly reduced the supply rate and non-supply dependent factors are suddenly a lot less affected by newly issued Steem and more affected by buying and selling.
I think the supply now is outpaced by the network effects leading to the ratio of sellers versus buyers, by not a huge amount, maybe 0.1% a day or so, but since HF 0.16 I am now seeing a slight upward trend and I think it is because the parameters have been brought into line with the causes of the activity leading to more sell than buy.
I LOVE the selfie!! Time for a new hobby man, nobody cares about your whining anymore...
I made the decision to put your account on cheetah's automatic comment downvoting list (not posts, just comments) because I saw your STEEM price bot was still making comments in vaguely related but not really related posts. It looked pretty pointless and spammy to me. You suddenly bringing up your disagreement with the subjective value of my posts right afterwards was kinda funny. Anyway, it's good to see you're personally invested and care enough about Steem to share your opinions. !cheetah unreplyban
Okay, I have un reply banned @matrixdweller.
You do realise you've let everyone know in advance you're crashing the currency right? :P someone's going to know your coming and they'll buy steem up cheap.
This isn't his profile, this is someone else.
Oh wait yes, my bad, I remember him complaining about this guy, but that's a good thing I'd say, if the steem is going into the market that means he can't fiddle with things as much anymore.
as dedicated as you are to steemit, you deserve to earn better rewards and be treated with more respect
People didn't like your spammy bot. I almost was upset. You should be more careful when you are testing things.
I just had three of them on my posts and comments and at the third one I started to understand what it was and asked @matrixdweller if he was testing a bot.
Personally, I would never let a bot loose on the blockchain without strong limits on who it pesters to start with. Even, I might just make it produce a log of where it would have posted if I enabled it to do so, just to watch what it's doing.
The High Guardians of Steem have an interest in not letting the chain get filled with low value data. Some of them might be said to be overzealous. If you didn't notice that and go playing around with things that might interest them you should have been paying more attention.
I thought it was cool too, but it's the wrong approach to rolling it out.
I don't make it my business to check up on other people but you put stuff on my posts 3 times before this incident you speak of and I was starting to maybe think about getting annoyed.
So I do know something of what I am talking about and I am more subtle in the way I try to alert you to what is going on. You remember the comment I made in response to one, maybe it was the day before yesterday. I was also suggesting by what I said that maybe you were being to exhuberant in letting your bot cut in on people's discussions.
This post has been ranked within the top 80 most undervalued posts in the first half of Jan 23. We estimate that this post is undervalued by $2.88 as compared to a scenario in which every voter had an equal say.
See the full rankings and details in The Daily Tribune: Jan 23 - Part I. You can also read about some of our methodology, data analysis and technical details in our initial post.
If you are the author and would prefer not to receive these comments, simply reply "Stop" to this comment.