I am not definitely against bringing back the league system however I don't like the way this proposal deal with it.
For example if you decide to play in bronze league but get reward cards over this limit than every card above the league limit is useless (if I don't count the small amount of glint you can get back by burning).
Another point is: Why a player with a max-level-deck cannot decide to play in more than one league in this case ? This would do IMO sense as benefit for his investment.
Maybe the most important point is that it does make the way for a new player who is ready to invest a large amount of money harder. Now he can buy a max-level-deck and beat (nearly) all opponents in bronze, with this proposal he would need to decide if he want play in bronze where he cannot use the advantage of his max-level-deck or if he play in diamond / champion where he probably get beaten by more experienced player.
Mayve I overread it but I could not see that this proposal say something about diamond / champion - this was in the "old" system two leagues with the same cap (max) - should this stay or what would be the plan ?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Was a well stated objection by many by now. One possibility would be to redo the ranking rewards to regulate it. Those that get the most rewards would be so or so incentivized to go to a higher league, with higher rewards. Other thing is you choose your league from the start. There are tournaments with league caps in place so if chose to play np-but at the lover archon caps not like now. Diamond has always been a black sheep of the family, should be done with long ago.