You are either advocating for a tragedy of the commons or asking to get sibyl attacked. Those who don't have a stake has no skin in the game in long term sustainability of the game. Those who have the most to loose should make the decisions. I don't recall a single instance where community vote and staked SPS vote were opposite. Most of the community agrees with the general direction of staked SPS votes. Below is the voting statistics for this Proposal:
| Votes | |
|---|---|
| Total For | 94,474,493 SPS |
| Total Against | 8,820,110 SPS |
| Total | 103,294,603 SPS |
| Voters For | 234 |
| Voters Against | 44 |
| Total Voters | 278 |
the only other option is getting the attention of the minnows & dolphins, which I am attempting to do
This is good. We need more participation in both HIVE and SPS governance. Not voting itself is a vote. It means they don't care. We have to get them to care.
Neither! I'm just trying to provide perspective on this slippery slope to Everyone! Regardless of current stake. Yes we should all aim for more stake, I agree. But in this very moment its not like I can just cough up 15 Million SPS xD Therefore, just encouraging those that pay attention to consider another path. And yes, hopefully we can get more to care about voting in general
The only way to make decisions is voting with the stake. Anything else leads to tragedy of the commons or vulnerability for sibyl attacks. People can make decisions with their property. If they disagree with the collective decision, the option is to leave for something that match their preferences.
I don't think we're on the same page here. All I'm saying is we as a community should choose to maintain healthy boundaries for our Ethos. If it passes then yeah, there's nothing to change at that point, but until then this is still just a pre-proposal and we all can vote to edit the 3rd Elect for this position - A community member that's not part of the Company/Team.
Yes. This is what staked SPS voting is for. That is how the community choose. Whether we ban company members from being a part of DAO itself is a DAO Proposal. You are welcome to make it yourself and we can have a vote from the stakeholders.
I agree completely with this. I do think this is a DAO decision as for the rules, and an individual decision for anyone that wants to be a treasurer/board member/etc.
True, I can very much agree to this! Once I'm in a better financial situation I'll make a DAO proposal for healthy boundaries. But also, its not like we really got a choice on the first 3 elects in the first place which is kinda mehh. A poll woulda been cool.