I think Steem should be for all, so ability to invest should not determine how well you do. I can understand some are desperate for money and we have to get them on a productive path. It's all part of what makes Steem exciting to me.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I agree. Quality of content does not correlate with having money to invest and I care about seeing and creating quality content, not how big people are. I think it is harmful to have a platform that actually needs people to invest in order for them to see any success.
When one could post random shit and boost it in profit I saw all kind on social trash entering steemit. I can't say i liked it.
I am all about good content and honest engagement. There is little I can do about vote buying, but I will do what I can to support those who can help grow Steem.
What if feeding no-investment accounts actually prevents steem from growing?
Not everyone has money to invest, but they may have something else to offer. We need a mix and to reach a critical mass that encourages people to invest.