You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Have you voted in the Steem Alliance Structure Proposal Election? Less than 24hrs left! - Why I think you should...

in #steemalliance5 years ago

Hmm directly involved as in who is in the WG and proposals? We have 3 active WG members and 5 proposals.. so maybe 10-15 “actively involved” individuals in the process itself.

Ah yes.. collaboration was not accepted well. I think that is just that many are still seeing this as some sort of leadership election.. rather than people working together to come up with the best idea for a foundation. Hopefully calmer minds prevail as the process goes along.

I’ve realized there is absolutely no way to make everyone happy, we can just do our best and try to show through actions what the goal is.

I personally am pretty excited to see where this goes, as I think it will be really beneficial for the community and hopefully fill the gaps that we see here.

Thanks for being involved!

Sort:  

Agreed on all fronts, I appreciate all of the conspirators efforts 😂 kidding..

15 max OK good to know, I'm still a bit miffed by the low turnout but also see steem as an incubator of sorts for people that aren't exactly into voting..

If 50/50 curation was on the chopping block I'd venture to say thousands would vote... Baby steps to reformation...

Posted using Partiko Android

Yeah it’s hard to see what a “good” turnout would be as we have never done anything like this before.

Only reference we really have is for the election of the WG (which many also thought was for some sort of leadership role within the foundation) and we had about 500. Out of those, many showed up on the last few hours and someone told them too and simply voted. I only say that as there was much less “work” involved in the voting process and the decision itself.. plus people thought it was for a power role 😄

I do believe when (and if) any vote for leadership comes around, more will show up. This is sort of for a technical aspect that many just don’t seem to be interested in, and I kind of get that.

Yeah, I assume 50/50 talk would bring many.. as they know it would affect their payouts (in one way or another)... humans are interesting creatures 🙃

"interesting" absorbing, engrossing, fascinating, riveting, gripping, compelling, compulsive, spellbinding, captivating, engaging, enthralling, entrancing, beguiling; appealing,attractive, amusing, entertaining,stimulating, thoughtprovoking,diverting, exciting, intriguing, action-packed;

informalunputdownable

I'll stick with strangely predictable as the most appropriate description of humans.

Posted using Partiko Android

😂😂😂 winner!!