You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: "Sounds Good So it Must be Accurate" - My Scientific Mind

in #steemstem6 years ago (edited)

Don't forget to ball up vaccines as "soft science", that is the quintessential "scientists" not checking references or references' references, nothing else explains how Polio was "isolated" two decades before the electron-scanning microscope was plugged in for the first time or how the way antibodies works is still erroneously taught in universities across the world "it's basically a key mechanism" even though there was never anything but conjecture spawned from the anus to support it and for over 4 decades now we've had the indication that it was never the case.

As for soft sciences, this article Phrases the "hard" problem in a way that is both hilarious and which will correctly wipe the smugness off your face that manifests in your PS.

Posted using Partiko Android

Sort:  

Medicine is an art that utilizes hard sciences.

You can be angry all you want through a marvel of modern engineering and hard science we call computer. You can transfer the thoughts and narratives of arm-chair experts and scream at the bottom of your lungs while hard sciences dominate every part of your existence, from communication to transportation.

I don't need to argue what has already been won.

There are plenty of studies with hard evidence to back vaccines. Just not all of them.

I have the read the article and others that are similar. It all comes down to the same thing. Intellectual sophisms that might get a naive girl wet from an arm-chair philosopher that hasn't gotten laid for a while.

I don't reply to nonsensical jargon.

If you want specific replies to that article then you have to do it using your own words. Be precise. Anyone can throw links around.

In science, and what happened with polio, was done under systematic observation even if we did not completely understand the mechanism.

The study you provided does not say that vaccines do not work. It simply says that the mechanism is more complicated than previously thought.

A vaccine in general triggers the immune system to create antibodies. In other words, the composition doesn't have to be that specific but rather encompass a range in which the body can react to it.

Also stop bringing anti-vax debates to different forums to make a point. You clearly don't understand biology either and you try to play smart ass because you saw some other idiot pointing this out as evidence.

Steemit has enough anti-vaxxer morons. We don't need more.

Dude, just study biology, join a lab, and perform experiments yourself. Then start teaching the biomedical community about how antibodies don't work.

The problem is that you don't understand what you read.