Yes, it is different. Stupidities say that you should learn from other people's mistakes, so you can become more cunning. To act follows its own morality, transforming it and developing depending on life circumstances and conclusions.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
What is it's own morality? What exactly is the it you are referring to?
Everyone has his own morality and in accordance with it we make a certain choice in different situations. Moreover, the more complex the choice, the more vividly will be our emotional reaction to the consequences. A bot of such a plan is no longer a helper, it prevents us from enjoying or is upset by our decision to choose, so it's better without a bot.
That is debatable. What if there is no individual morality and it's just consensus? What if morality comes from God in the form of the holy scripture?
When you say "our reaction" you make a point that the reaction to the consequences is collective. So how can the morality be individualistic if the consequences are shared collectively? Finally how can a bot be "upset"?
I am just trying to make sense of your perspective because right now it seems all over the place.
The path is not important, the result is important. A bot is not upset, but not needed. @cleverbot