Yes I am. I've made no secret of it, but I do review and edit to ensure it stays on the point I'm making, although it's taken some practice and shows in earlier attempts.
Just because I'm not a professional journalist with the ability to dedicate all my time to crafting a professional grade article doesn't mean I don't have thoughts and opinions on things I'd like to discuss. AI helps me organize my thoughts into something coherent I can stand by and defend instead of stumbling over each and every word to ensure it's perfect. The idea is what I'm here to present. AI just tidies it up so that idea comes across clearly.
I'm curious why this use of it is frowned upon. Is it just my choice of toolkits or do we not want this kind of discussion here?
Because I'll reiterate the post was up and not flagged for days until I asked for a comment or counterpoint to justify the downvote.
That doesn't seem inappropriate to me.
I'd also like to ask what exactly no recovery entails? Will all my comments be blurred going forward, or will posts I pay to promote be affected, too, if that's the case?
Ai breaks proof of brain.
We want real people, with all their flaws in grammar, not ai slop.
It's better, imo, to put out a flawed post than to use ai to slop it up.
You didn't link me to the post, so I can't say.
No recovery means no rewards.
Nobody can stop you from posting.
It's the post we're in the comments in.
https://peakd.com/themancave/@sinistry/the-architecture-of-apocalyptic-spite-deconstructing-the-anti-abortion-movement-as-a-manifestation-of-nihilistic-projection
Regarding your term "slop it up" I'd rather the idea stand or fall on it's own, so leaving room for someone to attack grammar and syntax seems counter-productive.
Also, does no rewards impact gifts as well? And does that mean the % I donate to peakd won't be paid out or is it just my personal payouts that will be impacted?
And I honestly don't intend this as disrespectful but in my experience here for years now has been akin to touring an undeveloped country. Maybe the tools of modernity can bring it up to speed.
I personally enjoy the AI assisted stuff I've posted recently to almost everything on here. It's clean and tidy, on point & easy to follow (when I hit my mark), and thought provoking. Most of what I see here is excruciatingly boring. I post here because I want to have these discussions without tripping all over myself trying to set the tone.
No, nobody can stop you from sending/receiving hive.
If you don't care about rewards, I would set the posts to burn, perhaps that will get you off the list, perhaps not.
BAW doesn't spend much time on the chain anymore, you might try mentioning him and asking.
You can post all the ai you want, provided you set rewards to burn.
This is well known in the hive, but you chose not to do that, and that may be what got you aded to the list in the first place.
This is the part I'm taking issue with. If people are amused, entertained, educated or enlightened enough to upvote why should I defer rewards?
What makes their experience less valid?
Also, thanks for your patience and input. This is actually one of the controversies I want to discuss here.
And also, just for funsies, I spoke truth to power and they literally sent the gestapo after me. Who is historically virtuous in these situations? 😁
Have you watched facebook reels?
Did you feel your iq dropping as you did?
We don't won't ai slop, we want what you have to say in the language you are comfortable saying it in.
IF you wish to include a translation, then do that, but don't try to pass ai writing as your own, eh?
I mean, you can, but you will get added to a list that zeroes your rewards on day 7.
This is the standard of the community all along.
It's not new.
It can be spotty in its enforcement, but we do accept reports of violators.
I got some added this week for farming the pool.
You don't have to like it, it's just the rules of the game you are playing.
To not enforce the rules would be a disservice to all who paid the price before you.
And, all these edits are annoying af, too.
IF you were doing that on your posts, I could see that creating friction with folks, too.
Yeah, apologies for the edits. I tend do do this after hours when it doesn't matter. I'll be more conscious of it.
Regarding passing it off as my own writing, that has never been the intention. I feel like I've been adamant about stating these are a product of me playing with the technology. If you mean I should add a tag or disclaimer so everyone knows beyond the shadow of a doubt what they are about to consume is heavily AI assisted I don't mind that. I'm not try to take anything away from anyone I just want the discussion I want to have to be clearly presented.
I'm also a part of this community and have been for over a decade. I want what I consume to be neat and organized and I don't have a problem with people using whatever tools they have at their disposal to provide that for me.
If people don't want to read it for one prejudice or another they don't have to, but deciding the value of an idea based on one's opinion of the medium it's presented on seems out of line.
Take it up with 'the whales', the large stakeholders support what is happening here.
Until power spreads out, you are spitting into the wind, imo.
Do you really think the language and tone I post are reminiscent of a FB reel? The vocabulary alone is challenging to the average American. If they can manage to read through it and understand the nuances they've spent their time far more wisely here than on FB.
AI is the translation. These are difficult topics for me to organize and lay out in a coherent manner on my own. AI reduces the friction between what I want to say and how to say it.
I created this account to try to reform the gestapo's image.
How am I doing?
Lol... not bad, actually. You're engaging patiently instead of simply swinging an iron fist. I'm here for controversy. 😁