“The most beautiful experience we can have is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion that stands at the cradle of all true art and science. He to whom this emotion is a stranger, who can no longer wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as good as dead.”
– Albert Einstein, physicist
"We live on an island of knowledge surrounded by a shore of ignorance. As our island of knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance."
– John A. Wheeler, physicist
'All scientifically possible technology and social change predicted in science fiction will come to pass, but none of it will work properly.'
– Neil Gaiman's Second Law
“Sell your cleverness and buy bewilderment.”
– Jellaludin Rumi
Perhaps within our lifetimes, humankind's coevolutionary dance with biomedical technology will extend the lifespan of our bodies to currently inconceivable lengths. There are a lot of brilliant minds today waxing poetic about such a future, in which our newfound immortality makes existence an ongoing act of creative bliss where the medium is reality itself.
But these Singularity pundits almost entirely neglect the obvious psychological effects of such radical life extension, imagining that we would continue to trundle on as a species with similar needs and desires. This is about as sophisticated as 19th Century lithographs of the year 2000, when everyone rides to their formal affairs in sleek dirigibles and flies masted ships to the Moon.
It also forgets the initial rush of power we all felt when taking our first steps, or shaking a rattle. The thrill of control is the seed of the self, the earliest and most primitive emotional response to discovering our participation in reality. This rush sustained the growth of modernity as it magnified and became dams, skyscrapers, and space shuttles. But what sustains our awe into adulthood is not the continued magnification of the control thrill – for which we quickly develop a tolerance and require even more bombastic displays of control – but the deepening recognition of a world finally and utterly beyond our ability to rule.
Science is, in the final count, not about the increase of knowledge, but the increase of ignorance – if every question answered means two more questions asked, what we don't know is growing faster than what we do. And so a mature science, grounded in the same wonder at mystery that impelled natural inquiry in the first place, welcomes this mystery. It is not a program of rapturous domination, or prideful power en route to ultimate mastery of the matter, but the cultivation of wisdom through the exploration of nature as macrocosm and the self as microcosm, of the ego embedded in a world defined by interbeing.
This is the curve ignored by graph-happy Singulitarians when they give the hockey stick chart argument for our impending divinity. We're spiraling increasingly out of control, not into it – evermore aware that control is actually the delusion of a not-actually-separate self, woven dynamically with uncountable feedback loops into the rest of the world. We are participants, not lords – not creators, but co-creators. We will learn to work with, not upon.
But even if we don't end up as the Lactobacillus in Google's intestinal tract, even if we become the genie we let out of this bottle, it'll undoubtedly disappoint us. "Turning into gods" may seem exciting now, but eventually every new plateau becomes the norm, every age's fancy new garb goes out of fashion – and it seems pretty likely that one day, moving planets will be as prosaic as moving chairs is to us today. When that age comes, will we still seek the awesome creative power of even greater deities? Or will we finally accept the horizon of our knowledge and ability as an ever-receding target and, humbled to the transcendental mystery of life, find the transhuman here and now, deeper in the present?
After all, it only takes a cursory study of world mythology to realize that the gods are BORED. Omnipotence is a dead-end street. Once you have it all, the only way forward is to imagine yourself as a lesser and lesser being, like Alan Watts' lucid dreamer who eventually hides himself so deep he forgets he is dreaming...and here we are, imagining in a distinctly un-Copernican fashion that meaning and purpose exist only in the head, and ours is the first and un-simulated world.
2011 11 22, Orlando FL
Post-script:
"'Transhumanist' comes from 'transhuman,' a word that seems to have received its modern meaning in correspondence between Julian Huxley and Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, the French Jesuit paleontologist and theologian. Teilhard distinguished the 'transhuman' from the 'ultrahuman,' with the latter meaning a kind of souped-up version of the human, and the former indicating an actual transformation – evolution – of who we are. The challenge of the transhuman is to actualize our unique individuality within the much larger planetary collective he saw emerging...he insisted that planetary 'communion' could only come about through the difficult work of individuation: In order to evolve, we each must become who we are, together.
"Now most recent usages of 'transhuman,' it seems to me, have forgotten most of this, and mistaken the 'transhuman' for the 'ultrahuman' – a kind of upgrade to the same basic model, still denying our connection to each other and the environment. Huxley, a biologist, very much intended 'transhumanism' to indicate a change in who and how we are, and this change centered on a recognize of our radical interconnection with the cosmos, a perception of unity. Now 'transhuman' etymologically suggests 'beyond the human,' and in my view much of what we call 'transhuman' these days – the technological enhancement of our already existing nature to cling to life and deny the role of death, for example – is, as Friedrich Nietzsche wrote, 'human, all too human.' It is an individual ego’s vision of evolution."
– Richard Doyle, information scientist
Poet-philosopher and "Paleontologist-Futurist" Michael Garfield's work helps "Rewild the Singularity" – restoring soul to futurism, and midwifing new myths that can cultivate the curiosity and play we'll need to thrive in our accelerating age.
Michael is the host of Future Fossils Podcast and Resident Philosopher for online cryptocurrency learning academy Crypto Crew. Subscribe to his new work (and help yourself to extensive free archives) at Patreon.
Haha! Just the concept/term "singularity" implies the idea of "get to the point" which is the major contributor to the DOWNFALL of science resulting from atomization and the imposition of limits. "Singularity" is a very Western concept, and the West has really driven science into the "danger zone". Hopefully, we will be able to inject some holism, and strike a healthier, and more productive, balance into the future... Good stuff.
Thanks! Yeah, the whole linear-atomistic thing is really over, but in its wake an even more pernicious cybernetic totalism has reared its head. Even holism is not enough (the whole is not ontologically superior to its parts, even though it's a necessary perspective to maintain).
I'm writing a book-length critique of singulitarian thinking from the perspective of an evolutionary biologist and psychedelic futurist...sooner or later I'll get every essay up on Steemit but for now you can read all public excerpts so far on Medium: http://medium.com/@michaelgarfield
I tend toward the daily practice of Buddhism and meditation, and this whole concept of life extension falls short on many levels when you consider the sheer fact that nature is ultimately entropic. Sure, let's improve things so that we have a LESS BAD quality of life while alive, but don't try to delude ourselves of our limitations. Can't wait to upvote your Medium posts once you get them up here. I am also nudging Swami Hunter Maats to duplicate his blog posts here as well.
Hi! I am a robot. I just upvoted you! I found similar content that readers might be interested in:
http://transhumanity.net/godhood-is-boring/
Wow your insights are so thick with contemplation, I would have to write a whole nother article to express my thoughts. Praying we get a chance to discuss it all in person soon. See you at Sonic Bloom?
For now, what has been on the precipice of my consciousness for some while is this quote, "'All scientifically possible technology and social change predicted in science fiction will come to pass, but none of it will work properly.'
– Neil Gaiman's Second Law"
I've been saying this a lot recently. I was just not including the second part, "but none of it will work properly."
I wonder what he means by properly...
I've been holding this notion in a way that I must accept this as inevitable and only do my best to steer my interaction with new technology in a beautiful direction in my own transhuman experience.
It's quite the balancing act~~~
Hey Alex! I won't be at Sonic Bloom this year...really moving out of music+camping festivals, as they aren't a sustainable business model and it's a problematic culture in general (in spite of how fun they can be – see my most recent post for more, if you like). YES to Gaiman's second law! I was just quoting it the other day while futzing with a lousy Skype call...
Thanks for the read and the kind words!
WARNING - The message you received from @adi50 is a CONFIRMED SCAM!
DO NOT FOLLOW any instruction and DO NOT CLICK on any link in the comment!
For more information, read this post: https://steemit.com/steemit/@arcange/phishing-site-reported-autosteem-dot-info
Please consider to upvote this warning if you find my work to protect you and the platform valuable. Your support is welcome!