do you have an alternative theory?
honestly though. a cable car will permit the elderly and very young to reach the summit. what right do we have, to insist that the elderly and the very young should not have access to the same nature?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Hello. Interesting question. With the cable car installed, would the surrounding area still be part of nature? Would it still be the natural world, unstructured by humans?
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/nature
Sometimes I think the presence of a human mind changes nature into something else that is not necessarily natural.
Yes, sometimes we change it beyond recognition into the unnatural.
But remember that humans evolved within nature, and are part of nature.
The human mind is after all, a natural organ! I believe that it's human nature to facilitate access to these beautiful places, and so long as it's not destroyed, then allowing more people to see this beautiful sight only enhances it's natural beauty by allowing others to experience it!
It makes me wonder if the fields and forests are still natural with houses in them? And I think yes! Because human structures are like those created by ants, we just are better at shaping our world than the ants :)