Maybe you took my comment personal. I was speaking more broadly in general. I wasn’t meaning in terms of your specific post or of something you were doing.
My comment was my thoughts as I read your post.
Sorry if it came off as pointing a finger. Wasn’t intended that way.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Mostly I just see hive as a bit stuck in what it was and would love a sea change in perspective and turning of focus to what we could be.
As to the spendhbd,
I think this is an innovative way to use hive. I see spendhbd in its first iteration, and surely it will get refined, but as a vehicle for buying hbd, spending hbd and the potential of advertisement and value gained by the business that accepts hbd… this is the exact kind of innovation hive needs.
Anything that gets people, buying, selling, moving, accepting hive and HBD is a win for the ecosystem.
Even if the post is not proof of brain
Sure, maybe I wasn't clear in the post, I'm mainly talking about attention and the posts that get rewarded regardless of it. Don't wanna drop usernames here but it's probably easy to find many where all the authors do is drop 1-2 posts daily and get free votes all day every day without a care if they're actually deserving them.
Spendhbd is innovative and new and will most likely get refined, but it's not about attention cause not many wanna look at such posts on a daily basis. They have their own usecases and curators can evolve the way they curate them based on different criterias, like how we curate reddit shares based on their own thing and not based on attention.
It's the "downvotes" comment that's kind of triggering, as if people are going around downvoting any legitimate attempts to use the rewards pool for something new/innovative.