Thanks for this information content. It has brought to light what curators are looking out for.
For me, I always thought being consistent was the most important thing on hive, and I'm surprised you mentioned it's not about consistently posting.
I'm certain I put in much effort on hive, I engage with others, create content, and engage in anything that can help promote hive.
I may just be a few months on hive, but I think I've tried my best to stay active and support hive projects in my own little way.
I'm also open to learning and improving to add more value to the chain. Honestly, I have never been in any unique platform like hive, so I'm here to build for a long term.
Consistently posting is important if you wanna do good, but there are some who only do Consistent posting to maximize the rewards they take out and ignore the rest.
Okay, I get the point now. Taking, but not giving in return.
yes, I've been looking at the top 100 monthly authors from @dalz' reports and some of them really make me wonder how they're getting rewarded so much, when there's others doing a lot more and actually getting engagement on their posts.
Yet if you dare to downvote them slightly to adjust the rewards you're seen as the bad person when all you're doing is trying to make the place fairer.
No matter what you do, even if it's for a good course, people would always see the bad side, especially if it affects them personally.
Just keep up with doing good and protecting hive. I think it should be everyone's obligation.