You can't have an ethical code and anticensorship code at the same time.
I remember discussing before the idea of how people can store images of underage pornography as text (then convert it using simple tooling) on the chain and how the witnesses should deal with it. Some said that they should fork out the accounts, others said this should not be done because it endangers the integrity of the chain.
People can believe in different ideas, hence they will support different things. But people can agree on the rules of the game, same as in football, and anyone who wants to take part in the game should in priory agree on its rules first.
If it doesn't count, then we must restructure the code until it does.
This is the right path, to make changes that will make it extremely hard for anyone even with a large stake to play God. Many examples were presented that can be implemented to definitely solve the problem, and this should be the case right now. To make the proper changes and push for an HF along with the unfreeze of Tron stake.
Problem is, not everyone likes this idea since right now, many are at the top only because of Pumpkin.
You can't have an ethical code and anticensorship code at the same time.
I disagree. But we will see what happens.
Neither of us are in a position to write code or buy mass-amounts of steem, so what game do we play?
It'd be nice to play football with rules we've made, but what about the pig from whom the ball is made?
I don't think that ethics are as simple as right or wrong, or 0 or 1.
"I don't think that ethics are as simple as right or wrong, or 0 or 1."
This remembers me of a comedy when a girl asked her boyfriend after having unprotected sex with him if he had HIV, he responded by yes and no.
I agree, ethics are complicated and can be very diverse. knowing the ultimate source of what is right or wrong is still a question that is fueling the clash of civilization as demonstrated by Samuel Huntington.
Thank you for your time,