You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Softfork 0.22.2: why I didn't apply the changes to my witness node.

So with your logic:

If you lend me money, with the expectation to be paid back later, but I simply give it away, then I'm good, because you could have demanded to be paid back earlier.

Nice loophole you found there, buddy.

image.png

Sort:  

Not a loophole.

The new owner has paid for the acquisition. Do we have a problem? That needs to be resolved with Ned. Too bad he's not around to keep hostage anymore.

I guess we have to agree to disagree. Best of luck in your life with that logic.