Thanks
I agree with that.
Nice deflection tho πππππ€·ββοΈ
I dont have a problem with people making money especially crypto.
But how about some transparency.
Full dislosure.
Why can't everyone participate?
Why isn't it promoted?
Decentralization?
Wouldn't it be better for everyone on Hive?
If there were a way to integrate it intuitively and according to individual preference.
Perhaps if you follow someone you can set auto tip or something.
Or have upvotes and following/followers ratio to rank content as far as trending.
That would be a more relevant method for engagement and interaction.
Put creating a following on the content creator and the community.
Not on autovotes.
That might also be a method for stopping scammers as well as driving quality content.
I think the tipping idea like on Peakd is a good start.
You can bring all the users you want here, once they realize or feel the system is being rigged they will bail.
Thanks for the response.
Peace
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The keyword here is decentralisation I think. Not being centralised by a big entity means the users have to provide the services themselves. Witnesses are providing the network and the database (the blockchain). Other users provide services such as auto-vote, wallet etc...
Now in order to implement more features, we need more volunteer developers.
Why would they have to be volunteers?
The community should decide what it wants and have access to knowledge and information to choose, and thus drive development.
Reward for operation and maintenance (witnesses) should be intrinsic and expand in relation to network expansion.
Equitable positive interaction and opportunity will drive adoption on all levels, content creators, curators, and consumers but more than that, we need the individual network, preference driven, instant response capability, and multimedia integration that a facebook provides with the advantages of decentralization.
I meant just more developers, volunteers or paid for.