You tried before to censor my content via an ill composed open letter trying to dictate what I can and can't post.
Removal of incentive is not censorship. It's kinda interesting that you don't realize this.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Telling a person how many posts to post, or how to use their votes is censorship. As is downvoting posts until they don't display. In general, if you are trying to force behaviour it is censorship even if it's by negative reinforcement. They are censoring his voting behaviour.
His message is! Read for Christ sake the content before you put out a baffoon comment!
I am using standard, widely received definitions. You are resorting to name calling instead of addressing my point. You are not making yourself look very good, sir.
Oxford Dictionary
So, is that your definition of censorship? I note that on Steemit lowering the upvote amount reduces views, and that reducing it to the point that the post is made invisible does so more. Both of these meet the suppression standard of censorship, rather than the strawman of 'reduced incentives' you put out.
It's not about looking good now man, he's fucking pissed for all the shit he had to go through because of the shitty torture those pathetic scummy trolls ever-so-kindly graced him with.
Man, try to look at this whole shit from his point of view -
Imagine you were been bullied, roasted, name-called, spammed at, been a target of racist comments and so many other negative shit, and that too for almost two straight fuckin years - every. single. day. right from the minute one.
Tell me @inertia, would you still talk the way you're talking now; with "manners", "class" and whatnot?
Eagerly awaiting for your reply.
"It's not about looking good now man, he's fucking pissed for all the shit he had to go through because of the shitty torture those pathetic scummy trolls ever-so-kindly graced him with.
Man, try to look at this whole shit from his point of view -"
I've been looking at this from several points of view. I can see the validity of some of the points of view directed at Haejin.
Maybe Haejin should also look at some of the comments and maybe scale back his daily posts. As a compromise.
Personally, I think it's cool that Haejin is making for his posts. But if he's posting 10 times a day and making roughly the same on every post. Maybe he should scale back a little and let others have a shot of making that money.
Yeah, us reasonable people are trying to talk to him, while some dumfuks are still blindly raging on haejin and co, without even being ready to engage in any form of discussions, whatsoever.
They prolly only need a means of letting out their IRL anger and steem, and poor haejin seems like the perfect target for them.
Cunts, I say.
Thanks for the straight-forward reply, man; missed it a lot around here. looking at you @inertia
I don't give straight replies to people who are all over the place. I had a main point: removal of incentive is not censorship. All I got as a reply was name-calling and you defending the name-calling. There's no point in going over that.
If it's not censorship what is it? Dictating the content and manner in which the content a content provider provides... kind of sounds like censorship.
Ahh my bad man, I had only addressed your final comment of haejin losing his cool.
I see your point now. Seems like I jumped the gun there hehe; sorry about that.
Lost control over my feelings there, looks like all this drama made me lose my cool too lol
Yeah I realize that was wrong, now. Sorry again, man.
God, I'm literally all over the place here, been diluting my attention so I'm able to reply to everyone's claims and whatnot.
Won't happen again, @inertia.
Hope we're cool now?
sorry again
Well. "poor haejin" I think he's making enough now not to be called poor anymore. =)
If you are speaking to Haejin. Maybe you can convince him to just post once a day for a few weeks. Then he can up that to twice a day and keep it there. That might help calm things down around here.
And also. My last post seems relevant here.
https://steemit.com/dmania/@grey580/how-i-imagine-arguments-on-steemit-zg1hbmlh-t9fg6
lmao ahahahahaah true.
Hmmmmmmmm regarding your suggestion - idk man. I doubt he'd be ready to reduce the number of posts. I know if I was in his place, I wouldn't.
If we consider this assumption (which is almost like a fact, I think i did read it somewhere else), that haejin used to post 10 posts a day since day 1, whem he used to earn 0.01 per post, then it's not really fair to tell him to stop posting with the same frequency. See, if people didn't bother when he was earning 0.01, then let them fuck off when he's earning handsomely. Fuck me, I'd go on to say he deserves to earn $300+ per post now; it's because of his own hard work (unless he bought steem, well, still it's his own money invested?)
With that last logic though, even bernie's actions get justified. But bernie is the negativer one among the two. At least haejin used to rape the reward pool without sounding like a girl that's being punished in some brothel lmao.
Anyway man, it's all @ned's fault; he fucked up. He could set some restrictions and other responsible shit, but no! Gotta maintain dat sweet ass hair yo
do your homework Yes....more like 10+ months....but then again, that's like 5 years in crypto-time
This shit be like dat one planet in Interstellar dj lmfao
Not my point.
Then go delete your comment?
EDIT: or at least edit it man. elaborate please.
So I need to edit my comment because you can't follow along with my point? Also, what's with the sock puppet?
Yeah I know I'm asking much from the Gods of Gods, but please sir, I hope you listen to this pleb and comply. :(
Which one?
Their accounts haven't been destroyed. UI components do not REKT accounts. Websites are free to opt-in or opt-out of reputation data. Some sites do and they implement UI rules that adhere to the reputation data. It's up to the site owners because they own their own site. If you don't like it, go start your own site. You can use the same blockchain if you want.
You really shouldn't use a word like "censorship" if you don't know what it means. And since you clearly don't understand that word, I have my doubts that you can wield "bullying" too.