Extended lockdown - Sensible
For anyone interested in nitpicking, "lockdown" is a prison term. I don't mind if anyone wants to remain in house arrest, many people are doing the same for years already so to them this is a non issue. If that's what you wish to do, then that's probably the best thing that you can do for yourself and everyone else. One would hope you'd have the common wisdom not to foist your values onto those who might disagree.
Contact tracing - Sensible
Promoting the rat culture in my book is not the best thing since sliced bread, but I can see how sycophants, among others, in the rising army of unemployed will find this new career path very appealing. As a silver lining, I see this as excellent motivation to dump the universal tracking device, something I should have done a while ago.
Vaccinate everyone - Great!
As long as people like you don't decide who it is that should be vaccinated :) Seriously, as long as vaccines are kept optional, I don't care. The rising army of the ill is not my concern, really.
Now, digital certificates I guess is referring to microchips in your brains or whatever that conspiracy is. Which is false.
Quantum-dot tattoos hold vaccination record
https://news.rice.edu/2019/12/18/quantum-dot-tattoos-hold-vaccination-record/
McHugh said the team worked with a bioethicist to be sure the patients’ data remains protected. “She said we’re on solid ethical ground as long as people can opt out, like getting the patch with only the vaccine. Also, the patch with quantum dots only contains information about the vaccine received. It doesn’t tell you anything else about the person.”
Emphasis added by myself. We already had people tagged in various ways throughout history, this is surely not a wild stretch of imagination for anyone. Again, if this is something you wish for yourself, I won't stop you. Do get injected with whatever you wish.
American Vagabond and Corbett are pretty gross conspiracy nutcase websites and can either be dismissed easily
Lets start with https://www.corbettreport.com/gates/. I can't wait for your in-depth research and deconstruction of presented arguments, point by point. It shouldn't take longer than 5 to 10 minutes.
I'm not too interested in debating everything here since it's quite circular, however, I am quite curious about one part:
This, you must realise, is A very uniquely American train of thought. Of all the countries I've l lived in, nobody else has this very self-centred viewpoint, even China where I live, home to some of the most selfish people I've come across. They still have this innate understanding that if they get sick, it affects other people, and those people get sick and die. Thus, they should protect themselves in order to protect others.
What train of thought do you and other conspiracy nuts have that make you feel its totally ok to do whatever you want as long as you are personally not affected, regardless of how much others around you are as a result of your actions?
This question is a genuine one because I hear it a lot but to me, it legitimately seems like such a small leap of thought processes to realise it doesn't hold water:
Why on earth would it be optional to allow you to be responsible for the death of countless others? (If you think that's an exaggeration, remember, a religious leader in Korea was responsible for their entire outbreak, and there are numerous examples of singular people, at concerts and other places, that have been the source of large outbreaks)
Edit: I'll throw you a bone, I got a little time before I gotta start work so I'll quickly browse ONE video and google a couple of things (don't call it 'research')