Hello @sorin.cristescu
When you ask your students to publish AI-generated content (like the one above) , could you please remind them about our AI-content posting Guideline?
Before publishing any content, could you please read these guides:
Hive Guide 101: Hive 101
AI Guide: AI-Generated Content = Not Original Content
Plagiarism Guide: Why and How People Abuse and Plagiarise
Thank you.
Hello,
i think that you didn't catch the concept of the post.
the challenge is to ask a question to chatgpt , take his answer and then add our ideas
Hello.
The rewards should be declined in these types of posts, and it should be clearly marked in the title of the post that the writing is AI-generated.
Note my students are (unfortunately) very reluctant users of Hive. In 4 years, I don't think I've managed to retain even 1 in the community longer term. They are too new to hive and only use it for the examinations, they won't know how to "decline rewards". Also, most of the time the only rewards they'll get will be from me and perhaps a few francophone votes because they publish in French. Really no reason to get all worked up about it
I teach classes and afterwards I have to grade students at a distance, asynchronously, without the possibility to supervise the way they approach the topic of the examination
Before getting triggered in an "arrière-garde", Quixotic combat against progress, could you please read the rules of my examination:
Blockchains publiques et privées en 2022-2023
They are clear and apply to all the students: I explicitely ask them to use AI. I want them to become proficient users and to be able to leverage it and bring something on top of it.
Please update your AI-content posting guidelines accordingly, because only you can adapt to a world where AI will be pervasive, AI will never adapt to a set of static guidelines, as well-intentioned as they might be.
Hello.
I would appreciate it if you followed the general community guidelines regarding AI established 2 years ago.
Declined rewards + clear notification about AI in the title.
Thank you.
Several issues with this: it would be the students who publish who would have to "decline rewards" - but they barely manage to connect and post, they have no idea how to "decline rewards" and I certainly cannot enforce it. "Clear notification" is given in my instructions. Again, THEY publish, I cannot enforce that they follow the guidelines.
Third issue, the guidelines need to be updated: the field is rapidly evolving, you can't possibly expect guidelines established 2 years ago to still be relevant today when talking about AI.
Please let me know your view on the above
Three guidelines are still relevant and become even more relevant each day with more and more AI fraud and spam.