You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The rising dilemma

in #curation2 months ago (edited)

I don't understand the details of this discussion yet, seems long and with lot of nuances. @stickupboys can you write a short post and explain your point of view. I don't play rising star and will not play. I don't even know what that is. I do play Splinterlands and I will continue to play.

I personally use the term abuse a lot and I will use it as I see fit. If a game economy depends on hive curation upvotes then it's not a game at all it is just a faucet to get hive curation to survive. That's my view.

PS. Stickupboys, I have seen you around for a long time, but just checked your KE ratio is 62! Boy! That’s a lot! :)

Sort:  

I'm a massive fan of KE but as we all know it doesn't tell the whole story. The SUBs invested over 1600 Hive when they started 4 years ago, that's a lot more than most people.

a

I disagree. It's an excellent indicator. Prove me wrong with data :)

I've become a fan of the KE Ratio, because it matches my personal ethos with respect to Hive. My goal is to be a substantially persistent store of value. The KE in my instance serves as progress bar or goal.

Well that’s wonderful to know! Seems like I have done something meaningful for hive! I should give a talk at hive fest! :)

a

a

If there is a true story tell us the story. We love a good story. For the record I am not judging you, I know your name for a long time and I have no context regarding this discussion. I saw your name and KE that's all.

For the record north of 60 is not just high it’s anomalously high.

KE is a great starting point especially for my projects when choosing who to support on Hive. 99% of the time it works perfect for me

a

Yes, like everything else on Hive, there are many ways to look at things

They must have rewarded more than 1600, right? Again I have no context but just glancing through the discussion I can see many have significant issues with whatever they are doing