The point is that you are free to use your liquid (and even non liquid) rewards to buy whatever you want, just as the rising star account is. What's the point of earning Hive if we're only allowed to accumulate it?
It's like getting a job you are paid and then do what you want with the money but you made a job.
In this case there is no work done it's just copy paste with no "post quality"
I'm not sure I understood you 100% but you're saying because the account copy pastes the post it shouldn't get rewards? There are 2 issues with that, first is that the posts were not 100% copy pasted and there was also some work done regarding the calculations. The second is that regardless of quality of posts, there are people who want to vote for those posts and they do so with their own stake. Just like every post that is voted. 99% of the high paid posts $20+ are overpaid IMO. Very often there is no difference between the amount of work done on them and someone new, except for the network and, especially if it's a whale, hoping to get votes back.
Those votes are only countered by using downvotes but that is effectively a way to negate stakes that aren't big enough. In every stake system the higher the stake the higher the power. But the DVs create an even bigger gap where big enough stakes can neutralize smaller stakes completely. If someone were to get 50%+1 of all Hive they could, in theory, neutralize all other upvotes and never be fully neutralized themselves. Obviously that would be extremely difficult, in practice, and destroy Hive's value very quickly. Furthermore, these rules that are trying to be enforced by DVs are decided by those in power and they don't have to answer to anyone else, unless they really piss off other powerful users. If someone has a vendetta against someone else, they can destroy them. It's what happened to me and others by azircon. The rules are up to those in power and they aren't applied equally.
Yes but he might do it anyway and he's free to do so. I don't see any problem with it.
Then what was the point of bringing it up, just another time waste like most of you trying to defend this shit?
The point is that you are free to use your liquid (and even non liquid) rewards to buy whatever you want, just as the rising star account is. What's the point of earning Hive if we're only allowed to accumulate it?
It's like getting a job you are paid and then do what you want with the money but you made a job.
In this case there is no work done it's just copy paste with no "post quality"
I'm not sure I understood you 100% but you're saying because the account copy pastes the post it shouldn't get rewards? There are 2 issues with that, first is that the posts were not 100% copy pasted and there was also some work done regarding the calculations. The second is that regardless of quality of posts, there are people who want to vote for those posts and they do so with their own stake. Just like every post that is voted. 99% of the high paid posts $20+ are overpaid IMO. Very often there is no difference between the amount of work done on them and someone new, except for the network and, especially if it's a whale, hoping to get votes back.
Those votes are only countered by using downvotes but that is effectively a way to negate stakes that aren't big enough. In every stake system the higher the stake the higher the power. But the DVs create an even bigger gap where big enough stakes can neutralize smaller stakes completely. If someone were to get 50%+1 of all Hive they could, in theory, neutralize all other upvotes and never be fully neutralized themselves. Obviously that would be extremely difficult, in practice, and destroy Hive's value very quickly. Furthermore, these rules that are trying to be enforced by DVs are decided by those in power and they don't have to answer to anyone else, unless they really piss off other powerful users. If someone has a vendetta against someone else, they can destroy them. It's what happened to me and others by azircon. The rules are up to those in power and they aren't applied equally.
If we can use our votes to support hive-engine / nfts burn then we should be able to use our power to "unsupport" it too
Why? If I have a stake of 100 someone with a stake of 1000 can always negate my stake 100%. That doesn't happen in any other system.