Sort:  

I am wondering who cares about what stupid shit Tump said about who!
Its not like the voters had a real choice is it?

They had just as many choices as ever given on the historical record of rules that apply to elections. If Hillary had won instead of screaming foul over how the rules have been historically in place for hundreds of years they'd think the rules were working mighty fine.

So this couple of reporters, Lachlan Markay and Asawin Suebsaens who work for the Daily Beast and are described as some of the most meddlesome reporters on a righteous indignation tour want us to believe that some of the crazy stuff they'll be describing in their book that has never been heard before will be due to an overburdened press who simply can't keep up with all the perceived malice coming out of the white house? Really? I imagine then they've never heard the term "a slow news day" or realize that outside of a dramatic unfolding event that when it comes to reporters weekends are made for Michelob. The majority of news organizations scale back their staff on weekends, of course we realize you wouldn't realize this unless you had a hobby such as being a blogger. Whereas something to the degree of which you describe here would have set off a frenzy feeding on any given slow news day of the week but surely would have been a bonus filler for the weekend news cycle. We will see once this announcement isn't overshadowed by the Iowa fiasco and the acquittal if it goes spiraling through the news cycle just the same as it would have if said months ago....but then again who besides people like you who love to flame the fire yourself by your pull no punches name calling reporting and other assorted antics like displayed here where you went from opening your statement with "Trump allegedly said" to "when he says things like this" to a full blown headline claiming he did, is going to believe a couple of reporters whose call to fame is to do just that, in their view anybody associated with Trump is fuel for their fire.

Getting back to your "when he says things like this he doesn't do anything about the coalescing extremist movements, he makes the people who are into ideologies embolden more comfortable displaying their beliefs."

You mean like how when Obama was president people started feeling comfortable burning their neighborhoods down to the ground? It isn't Trump's job to do anything about these ideologies unless those who hold them are committing crimes, you know crimes like the one's we saw when neighborhoods were being burned to the ground. We know how much the left would love to shut down people's free speech rights. That simply isn't allowed and one day you may actually get that. It was a hard lesson throughout history as many Americans demanded just that from their leaders whether local or national....but the plain fact of the matter whether anybody liked it or not the Supreme Court ruled they had a constitutional right to their beliefs and assembly. There really isn't anything less damaging coming out of the mouths or actions of the left either when it comes to stroking the fears that are "supposedly" reinvigorating interest in these groups. You want to sit there all smug while labeling people and calling them names just how do you expect some people to be reacting to that?