No one is freezing any funds on Hive.
And please Google meaning of the word "neutral".
Neutral would have been not voting at all. They were not neutral.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
No one is freezing any funds on Hive.
And please Google meaning of the word "neutral".
Neutral would have been not voting at all. They were not neutral.
Voting for enough witnesses that neither side could istitute a hard fork is one of the most neutral things somebody could do.
No it is not. It's playing sides.
Not voting for anyone has the same effect if neutrality was the goal. It was not.
Not voting for anyone would have let the chain get taken over by who ever had the greater cash flow. Which probably would have been sun with the help of the exchanges
Again, thanks to votes from SCT and the rest of the korean community neither side could have made a move.
Witness votes are not a one shot deal so choosing to not vote is not the same as voting for both sides.
So shooting at both sides is neutrality? Tell it to Switzerland, who remained neutral in WWII.
proxy.token was extorting both sides, a hostile act against both sides. We left, and now proxy.token is where Sun Yuchen wants it.
Enjoy!
Yes preventing either side from hard forking is neutrality. Trying to make a point here? Locking down both sides is not a hostile act dog fucker.
Do not refer to your sexual predelictions again.
Aww such big words for "I know you are but what am I". Your english teacher will be so proud Mr.Dog Fucker
Edit: omg, you downvoted me xD. You are just so precious.
Awww poor dog fucker must of realized he has no fucking clue how the burden of proof works.
Trying to support both sides can also be counted as not taking sides; ergo basically neutral.
Helping maintain centralization on the chain is in no way neutral.
Helping to maintain centralization on the chain would be voting for 17+ tron witnesses. What they did is prevent either side from acting and tried to encourage conversation.
They did not encourage conversation. They made a list of demands.
What demands?
No downvotes, quick powerdown, etc.
Why argue about something you know nothing about?
Stop wasting our time and do the research to have an informed opinion.
The vast majority of the coumunity witnesses they voted for didnt support either of those things.
So again, you got no leg to stand on calling their actions "demands" dog fucker. People are allowed to choose who to vote for, thats how shit works