Sort:  

No it is not. It's playing sides.

Not voting for anyone has the same effect if neutrality was the goal. It was not.

Not voting for anyone would have let the chain get taken over by who ever had the greater cash flow. Which probably would have been sun with the help of the exchanges

Again, thanks to votes from SCT and the rest of the korean community neither side could have made a move.

Witness votes are not a one shot deal so choosing to not vote is not the same as voting for both sides.

So shooting at both sides is neutrality? Tell it to Switzerland, who remained neutral in WWII.

proxy.token was extorting both sides, a hostile act against both sides. We left, and now proxy.token is where Sun Yuchen wants it.

Enjoy!

Yes preventing either side from hard forking is neutrality. Trying to make a point here? Locking down both sides is not a hostile act dog fucker.

Do not refer to your sexual predelictions again.

Aww such big words for "I know you are but what am I". Your english teacher will be so proud Mr.Dog Fucker

Edit: omg, you downvoted me xD. You are just so precious.

Awww poor dog fucker must of realized he has no fucking clue how the burden of proof works.

You reveal your lack of self respect and the dissolution of your mother with every ad hominem. That is whom the filth that comes from you reveals.