This is the 3rd occasion, you previously marked one of my other photos as a breach which it was not. You can use the same image so long as the post is different which I did.
Can you please elaborate on which of the previous 2 investigations we were incorrect?
They appear valid to me.
Or recycling post? (Our comment was correct. It was a double post. Although you did it by accident)
https://hive.blog/hive-187719/@melbourneswest/beer-saturday
The previous photography plagiarism post? (Unless it is your photo published in curated photography tag, the investigation was valid)
https://hive.blog/teamaustralia/@melbourneswest/good-night-rest-up-monday-is-over
We explained how authorship and copyright works and what publishing now own photography in curated tags work.
Please do not publish photography plagiarism.
Again you're incorrect and pulling statements and law out of thin air.
You've sent trolls to my account and caused loss of earnings. You need to provide recompense for your errors.
Anyway doesn't matter.
@featheredfriends and @detlev lost authors on their posts because of you.
Mind you, most community groups have bot voting. Pretty sure that's a thing. But you remain silent when you're on the cut.