As you said use for commercial purposes. You have made an allegation of plagiarism. That is a different matter which you're convoluting. This is the 3rd occasion, you previously marked one of my other photos as a breach which it was not. You can use the same image so long as the post is different which I did.
At no point did you apologise or rebute.
An explanation IS provided in the comments section of the post. Your response is Nul and void.
I am calling for a public apology or will commence a campaign to have you hard forked out..
An institution that has poor accountability and makes allegations without speaking to the party involved is the very definition of poor governance.
As the service I use is for political and business I am aware of what I can and can't do with them..
You explaining it to me incorrectly is quite offensive.
I am seeking an apology
Can you please elaborate on which of the previous 2 investigations we were incorrect?
They appear valid to me.
Or recycling post? (Our comment was correct. It was a double post. Although you did it by accident)
https://hive.blog/hive-187719/@melbourneswest/beer-saturday
The previous photography plagiarism post? (Unless it is your photo published in curated photography tag, the investigation was valid)
https://hive.blog/teamaustralia/@melbourneswest/good-night-rest-up-monday-is-over
We explained how authorship and copyright works and what publishing now own photography in curated tags work.
Please do not publish photography plagiarism.
Again you're incorrect and pulling statements and law out of thin air.
You've sent trolls to my account and caused loss of earnings. You need to provide recompense for your errors.
Anyway doesn't matter.
@featheredfriends and @detlev lost authors on their posts because of you.
Mind you, most community groups have bot voting. Pretty sure that's a thing. But you remain silent when you're on the cut.