It means if you're "white" your grandparents weren't denied home-loans simply because of their skin color.
It means if you're "white" your grandparents and parents weren't the target of laws specifically designed to destroy your core family unit.
None of this is the average "white" person's "fault", they are not individually "responsible" for the "privilege" they've unwittingly enjoyed.
However, there should be some acknowledgement that many of their neighbors did not enjoy the same unspoken, invisible "privilege".
Skip to 124 seconds,
You might want to check my profile and my other postings to see where I come from. Anyway:
I am not responsible for what my grandparents did or did not do or get. Trying to instil guilt for that will only result in defiance from my site.
The core family has been destroyed by feminism and it has been destroyed for all races. Black are the canary in the coal mine where it shows up first. The rest of society will soon follow.
Feminism is and always was a movement of wealthy white women who tricked everybody else into there service.
You are looking at the wrong privileges:
I do agree that the war on drugs was a mistake and I'm in the legalise everything camp.
I agree with you that it's important to keep in mind that only 2% of "white people" owned slaves.
And I hope we can agree that there's no reason for the average "white person" to feel an ounce of guilt about slavery because they did nothing to promote it themselves.
HOWEver, "white people" have gained an advantage (however slight in some cases), generally, especially the Brits and Americans, from the historic oppression of the "other".
This is not a new phenomenon. The Hindus practically worship their history of systemic racism that spans thousands of years. The Egyptians and Romans built empires on the backs of slave labor.
Can you understand the plight of the characters in movies like "FIRST BLOOD" and "FALLING DOWN"?
2 minutes,
2 minutes,
Now imagine millions of people who feel the exact same way.
Sure their frustration should be focused on the BILLIONAIRES.
Sure, but our owners are very skilled at TURNING US AGAINST EACH OTHER.
I wonder if we talk past each other. Especially when you are quoting two videos of angry white men.
Brits, Americans, Egyptians and Romans — 🤔 — Which group of historic slave owner are missing from the list?
And while we are at it: The word slave comes from the word slavic and is a reminiscent from the times when the Vikings took the Polish and Russians as slaves. Everybody took everybody else as slave. Every group is both victim and perpetrator.
How very true.
But most people don't see the whole picture. AFAIK the only groups which does are men's rights activists.
Since your like videos, if you want to know how bad it really is I have two playlists for you:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLePIBGTG_9y1aE1Du8ITgxNAYgHoJVmJH
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjMscr0TpRqjE8WcuGrAnJ5KLZ8DeuY39
And yes that's a black woman talking at a men's rights conference right in the first video. She was not the only one.
I think you might like this,
https://tubitv.com/movies/399199/the_red_pill?start=true
It starts out skeptical, but ends up making a very strong case for "mens rights".
Of course I have seen the red pill. Have you seen the The Red Pill: Raw Files?
Is there some reason we can't simply call it a "human rights conference"?
+PROHUMAN
+PROFAMILY
I made a similar argument with regards to female genital mutation. My argument was: Could we not call it child genital mutilation? Almost always there was a huge pushback. I have given up. We have to do the fight against male genital mutilation on our own.
The urge to protect women at the expense of men is deeply engrained in the human physic.
In the 1970 some European countries had Ministry of Family Affairs. By now they have been renamed to Ministry for Women, Children and Elderly. Notice who is now missing?
The USA once had a law against domestic violence. By now this law has been replaced by the Violence against Women Acts. Notice which violence is now ignored.
Any "human rights conference" would focus on women's rights and eventually be renamed to ”women's rights conference“.
As such it is absolutely necessary fro men's rights to differentiate themselves from the more general human rights.
Good point. For some reason, Christians just love mutilating baby boys.
Ok, maybe they could call it "men's human rights movement"?
Or could they go with "EAT THE RICH"!!
oR, DON'T BE BRAINWASHED BY THE "HERO MYTH"!!
4 minutes,
I do know the original reason: preventing mastubation.
Of course the reason changed over time as mastubation was destigmatised but that was the ordinal reason.
Yes, is actually one of the names we use. MRA is actually a given name. Given to us by feminists.
Do you see how you went for the Christians and left out the Jews? Why did you do this?