I wonder if we talk past each other. Especially when you are quoting two videos of angry white men.
Brits, Americans, Egyptians and Romans — 🤔 — Which group of historic slave owner are missing from the list?
And while we are at it: The word slave comes from the word slavic and is a reminiscent from the times when the Vikings took the Polish and Russians as slaves. Everybody took everybody else as slave. Every group is both victim and perpetrator.
Sure, but our owners are very skilled at TURNING US AGAINST EACH OTHER.
How very true.
- black vs. white
- men vs women
- straight vs gay
- cis vs trans
- …
But most people don't see the whole picture. AFAIK the only groups which does are men's rights activists.
Since your like videos, if you want to know how bad it really is I have two playlists for you:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLePIBGTG_9y1aE1Du8ITgxNAYgHoJVmJH
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjMscr0TpRqjE8WcuGrAnJ5KLZ8DeuY39
And yes that's a black woman talking at a men's rights conference right in the first video. She was not the only one.
I think you might like this,
https://tubitv.com/movies/399199/the_red_pill?start=true
It starts out skeptical, but ends up making a very strong case for "mens rights".
Of course I have seen the red pill. Have you seen the The Red Pill: Raw Files?
Is there some reason we can't simply call it a "human rights conference"?
+PROHUMAN
+PROFAMILY
I made a similar argument with regards to female genital mutation. My argument was: Could we not call it child genital mutilation? Almost always there was a huge pushback. I have given up. We have to do the fight against male genital mutilation on our own.
The urge to protect women at the expense of men is deeply engrained in the human physic.
In the 1970 some European countries had Ministry of Family Affairs. By now they have been renamed to Ministry for Women, Children and Elderly. Notice who is now missing?
The USA once had a law against domestic violence. By now this law has been replaced by the Violence against Women Acts. Notice which violence is now ignored.
Any "human rights conference" would focus on women's rights and eventually be renamed to ”women's rights conference“.
As such it is absolutely necessary fro men's rights to differentiate themselves from the more general human rights.
Good point. For some reason, Christians just love mutilating baby boys.
Ok, maybe they could call it "men's human rights movement"?
Or could they go with "EAT THE RICH"!!
oR, DON'T BE BRAINWASHED BY THE "HERO MYTH"!!
4 minutes,
I do know the original reason: preventing mastubation.
Of course the reason changed over time as mastubation was destigmatised but that was the ordinal reason.
Yes, is actually one of the names we use. MRA is actually a given name. Given to us by feminists.
I'm not sure that was the "original" intent.
It's my understanding that the "christians" adopted it from some obscure middle eastern tribe.
Do you see how you went for the Christians and left out the Jews? Why did you do this?
Because I thought it was obvious when I said, "for some reason".
"Judeo-Christian"
Is a farce. "Christian" Zionists are the most duped of all. They serve the demon they profess to be against.
You are either Christian, or you are a Zionist. There is no both.
Circumcision of the 'Heart' is the 'Christian' way. Circumcision of the penis is the other, brutal, traumatizing way.
Which only the christians of the USA still do. Christians in Europe have all stopped over 50 years ago. Or never started in the first place.
See my posting on Kellogg above.
I believe we agree on this. My only suggestion was that the "christians" adopted the practice from "the bible" (and we all know where that came from).