Ah, I understand what you saying better now. I've highlighted the TL:DR paragraph below 😁.
I've raised a couple of times that readers/receivers need to be better rewarded - I mentioned in a comment on this post about downvotes that I have benefited from only 23 verified emails out of 2,396 emails that I have read - less than 1% for 75 consecutive days of logging on and doing the work of reading (and voting) on emails.
Assuming that readers/receivers are not downvoted when they send a mail, they receive a basic 5 MAILs per read email. There is no need to use more than 1,000 MAILS for sending an email: we know there are/were 143 people with a reputation of more than 90% a few weeks ago and I would be very surprised if there were more than 500 people overall signed up, my guess would be less than 200. Even at 5 MAILS a read email, I found that I could accumulate 1,000 MAILS in ten minutes a day over three days. The fewer the emails arriving in your inbox each day, the more days it will take.
As my reputation increased, it went up to 9 MAILS per email - this was more than enough, and I have accumulated enough MAILS to see me through to Christmas, even if I never read another email during that time. I was irritated when the reputations were reset, because that put me back to 5 MAILS per email and I agree with you that this is not attractive to the average user. This is what I wrote in Discord after the CTP show implementing the reputation reset (apologies, you've probably read this before, but useful, perhaps, to include with this discussion):
I agree there are techniques to being successful and some of those techniques take time to learn and implement; however, they are fundamental to building an audience or network for anyone's blog, whether they use ListNerds or not. And, at the same time, I agree there are other ways to achieve engagement which are fun (whether they take time or not) and have better and faster rewards, unlike ListNerds which has a lot of drudge work and not very good rewards for doing it.
TL:DR -
Certainly on that score - rewards for reading/receiving - I agree with you. But is that resolved by adjusting the quantity of ListNerds required for the Enterprise subscription? Or are we simply perpetuating a structural problem with ListNerds (the focus on senders at the expense of receivers) that needs to be addressed?
The biggest challenge I see for ListNerds is leothreads - truly free, organic, easy and fun.
Thank you for linking that post with the timeline and language. I had seen it but I will go back and read it properly.
Great discussion, thank you for initiating it.
To be honest, since my idea was suggesting it as a temporary solution until all those "secret projects" are out and we have a clear path, I am inclined to say that within 4-5 months, no. I am very worried about the price in a month, yes, I read Mypathtofire's report and can see that the price went up from 0.01 to 0.02-0.03, but within a few days, we're entering the period where people were receiving 500-1500 per mail so if we call what's been happening inflation, what are we going to call that?
I guess the area we definitely agree on is that my idea is not a long-term solution, which is why I am glad we're talking here as opposed to DMs on discord.
The way I view my idea is duct-taping the pipes until the plumber arrives. AKA, keep things running until all the internals (I.E the issues you brought up) are fixed since it's between "surprises" and the dev being one man and unable to do everything at once.
I am definitely not going to say Listnerds could fall otherwise, but I am trying to get the ball rolling here. If I am wrong, then I am wrong. But, I would know that for sure, and so will people agree with me. At worst, we could eliminate a bad idea. And the situation on Discord and comment sections didn't provide a good process of elimination, hence, a post.
As I said near the end of the post, my sister got very ill and I am also ill myself, so I value the usual spending much more now.
Okay, I understand, and thank you for your patience.
As a temporary measure while other issues are addressed, I support your proposal.
I am sorry that you and your sister are unwell, I hope you get some relief.
No, thank you for voicing your disagreement. Many people tend to be agreeable or avoid pointing out what they perceive as wrong in the name of being nice.
This conversation is what I wanted.
😍
!CTP