We should rewrite that with both yours and my seal of approval.
If we could find a way to unite the anarcho-capitalist and anarcho-communist sub cultures, we could effectively subvert the NWO with a counter narrative in a world without central authority.
Lol, you said 'anarcho-crapitalust' like it was something other than a contradiction in terms.
That base link has the history, crapitalism has always been the direct opposite of anarchy.
I know crapitalusts like to wrap themselves in our flag, but deep down, they will fuck you for a dime.
Even a worthless fiat dime that enslaves them, too.
Money is rewarded within the system for conforming, not for being free from its control.
If a utopia needs armed thugs to persist, it sucks.
Likely the people allowing it to persist suck, too.
Those that aren't just koolaid drinking dupes, might be worth salvaging, might not.
Sorry to be harsh on that, but folks have died at the hands of crapitalusts while carrying the black flag.
Unarmed women, and children, sooo,....there is that.
In my sovereign state, you will die for not providing for yourself. Asking for help, for something you already can do, is a death penalty and the sign of the lazy squat in my books.
I am against welfare in every way, that's why I disagree with communism.
Can you describe what true anarchy would have in place of welfare for the needy? (I'd kill then)
Until you had seen the power of a black budget, I wouldn't expect anyone to understand how powerful anarcho capitalism is with the black budget style funding model.
Capital doesn't create wealth, labor does.
This book, and this short story, illustrate some viable alternatives to what we have.
If I had to condense them, they could best be described by keep working, stop paying.
This book shows why using money to redistribute from the working to the not working is a bad idea.
Families, and the church, were the welfare agencies before the police state came about.
They have their drawbacks, too.
Put me down as thinking that we have enough adults to carry the bums without all the hierarchy attached, better to just let them have food and shelter on the group.
They can then decide if that is enough for them to tolerate the derision of their peers.
Did you know that Poppy Bush started the USO?
My point being that even bad people do some good things.
Black budgets, pshaw, try the power of black majick.
The people reading that book are pulling the strings in this orchestra.
The idea of being financial free or not seems to be the most effective way to control people.
People are penalized with fines, loss of currency (retained spending power), for civil issues all over the world.
From left to right and up and down the political spectrum, when one's reflection resembles financial independence it leads to increased sense of individualism and independent lifestyles not dependant on the state.
I assume you have heard of the Zeitgeist, what do you you of that movements interpretation of a resource based economy?
Even I who is a picky eater, could probably trade my way through a resourced based economy making good trade terms with the locals farms.
People being scared to contract their own service agreements Isa another huge component, they need currency for the insurance model where no one is responsible except for the fall guy decided by in the terms and conditions known as liability.
I looked into Jacques some years ago.
He referenced either this guy, or this guy, I forget which, but Bookchin is a follower of Kropotkin, so he says pretty much the same.
I've only read enough Bookchin to know that.
He himself acknowledged his work as derivative of Kropotkin.
If I remember right.