I think the rewards for both our posts are relatively similar in terms of takeaway author rewards since I added a 50% beneficiary for @pob-fund.
Still, we're back to the matter of "what is deemed as over-rewarded?" and I did touch on that within the post you shared, highlighting that we can't read minds, so we cannot truly say what value it brings to others.
@scholaris used the metric of word count there to determine what is over-rewarded, but as you know with photography posts, that isn't always a good metric to use.
also, adequate;
satisfactory or acceptable in quality or quantity.
I've read your article series. Your article has value. Each post you've written on that series seeks engagement from the community.
It challenges the users to focus upon what you've presented and it offers a reward for engagement and successful completion of a task you assign.
Also, the community has defined the value of your work.
Alone, maybe it's worthy of a DV, but I haven't look at things like that and maybe I should.
The article you cite presents an interesting conundrum. I don't know how to proceed. While 50% of the beneficiary goes to the POB fund, currently about 100 goes to the author. Funds going to the POB fund doesn't shield from the appearance.
I still like this article though. I've never read about payout limits. I'm going to take your idea and expand upon it. Instead of two authors, I'm going to do a wide range of people top-down. Ask the community to discuss. We need to narrow down the subjectivity of this rewards nonsense.
Everyone needs to get on a similar page so we can just focus on damn content creation.
For an example of an adequately rewarded post, please refer to the following link: an adequately rewarded post. 138'ish words
Only 0.64 pob/word? How unfortunate !
Compare to this
https://www.proofofbrain.io/hive-150329/@calumam/the-trip-of-life
BTW, why do you not downvoted then?
I think the rewards for both our posts are relatively similar in terms of takeaway author rewards since I added a 50% beneficiary for @pob-fund.
Still, we're back to the matter of "what is deemed as over-rewarded?" and I did touch on that within the post you shared, highlighting that we can't read minds, so we cannot truly say what value it brings to others.
@scholaris used the metric of word count there to determine what is over-rewarded, but as you know with photography posts, that isn't always a good metric to use.
also, adequate;
Ugh I know. Word count works for some things, horrible for others. It's almost like we need an arsenal to address every angle.
I couldn't DV your article if I wanted to:
The article you cite presents an interesting conundrum. I don't know how to proceed. While 50% of the beneficiary goes to the POB fund, currently about 100 goes to the author. Funds going to the POB fund doesn't shield from the appearance.
I still like this article though. I've never read about payout limits. I'm going to take your idea and expand upon it. Instead of two authors, I'm going to do a wide range of people top-down. Ask the community to discuss. We need to narrow down the subjectivity of this rewards nonsense.
Everyone needs to get on a similar page so we can just focus on damn content creation.