RE: Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal

[onealfa.pob]

And here comes a small contest.

Be the first to guess who exactly were these two authors, (Author #1 and Author #2) in my screenshot above, and each right answer I will reward with 10 staked POB's. Let community know it's "heroes". :)

---

_{Posted via proofofbrain.io}

Comments

[calumam]

The two authors are myself, @calumam, and @lucylin.

---

_{Posted via proofofbrain.io}

[onealfa.pob]

---

_{Posted via proofofbrain.io}

[scholaris.pob]

For an example of an adequately rewarded post, please refer to the following link: an adequately rewarded post. 138'ish words

---

_{Posted via proofofbrain.io}

[onealfa.pob]

Only 0.64 pob/word? How unfortunate !
Compare to this
https://www.proofofbrain.io/hive-150329/@calumam/the-trip-of-life

BTW, why do you not downvoted then?

---

_{Posted via proofofbrain.io}

[calumam]

I think the rewards for both our posts are relatively similar in terms of takeaway author rewards since I added a 50% beneficiary for @pob-fund.

Still, we're back to the matter of "what is deemed as over-rewarded?" and I did touch on that within the post you shared, highlighting that we can't read minds, so we cannot truly say what value it brings to others.

@scholaris used the metric of word count there to determine what is over-rewarded, but as you know with photography posts, that isn't always a good metric to use.

also, adequate;

satisfactory or acceptable in quality or quantity.

---

_{Posted via proofofbrain.io}

[scholaris.pob]

Ugh I know. Word count works for some things, horrible for others. It's almost like we need an arsenal to address every angle.

---

_{Posted via proofofbrain.io}

[scholaris.pob]

I couldn't DV your article if I wanted to:

• I've read your article series. Your article has value. Each post you've written on that series seeks engagement from the community.
• It challenges the users to focus upon what you've presented and it offers a reward for engagement and successful completion of a task you assign.
• Also, the community has defined the value of your work.
• Alone, maybe it's worthy of a DV, but I haven't look at things like that and maybe I should.

The article you cite presents an interesting conundrum. I don't know how to proceed. While 50% of the beneficiary goes to the POB fund, currently about 100 goes to the author. Funds going to the POB fund doesn't shield from the appearance.

I still like this article though. I've never read about payout limits. I'm going to take your idea and expand upon it. Instead of two authors, I'm going to do a wide range of people top-down. Ask the community to discuss. We need to narrow down the subjectivity of this rewards nonsense.

Everyone needs to get on a similar page so we can just focus on damn content creation.

---

_{Posted via proofofbrain.io}