It's almost as if they WANT people to rise up and rebel, revolt, kick them to the kerb.
This contains a deeper psychology for me. I often thought about it and came to a similar conclusion. Between two people, or groups, you could call it "sabotage". The unaware psyche and superstructure behind human behavior. One person tries how far one can go, even unaware of the fact that it can be a "trial and error" effort. If the self is not quite certain about the outcome of a certain message and action, it just goes for it. And sees what'll happen.
The underlying uncertainty may give the feedback that what one was uncertain about what could be right, can become "right" in the process of feedbacks. When the feedback appears to be strong in one particular area, people might think and come to the conclusion to have found a "majority". As we moderns very much think in terms of "majorities" that will be the group to join, or, if one finds the self in a so called minority, resistance will form itself.
I would not say that "money is mind control" but that it's people who want to control. Money is just a means, but linked to opportunities. The more money, the more opportunities. Just the other day I was laughing at someones sentence, who said something like "have you found many sane minds within the super riches?"
Yes, anarchy is not well understood. "No government" actually is nothing which exists within a social group. There is always rules, no matter what. I would say that an anarchical community has more habits than explicitly out-formulated rules. Habits are based in a culture and within a longer time frame, habits change. But if you want to pin point rules, make them manifest or a superior law, it creates troubles on all sides.
"Manifest(ations)" can lead to the spirits one would have been wise to not unleash. In psychology, you can call it "a fixation onto something which tortures".
Greetings to you.
I said anarchy is 'no government' and you took that to mean 'no rules'? That is the exact trap I was speaking of. Anarchy is not 'no rules' it's no 'rule makers'. Gods laws sometimes called 'natural law' or 'common law' are the failsafe which we all revert to without gubbermunt. Commonlaw is all we need to keep order. Do no harm is the ultimate law.
As for revolution yes I do believe they are trying to manufacture their own controlled revolution for their ultimate purpose, which is 'order out of chaos' and the NWO. We have to be savvy enough not to fall into their trap.
When I said that anarchy is not really well understood, and referred to the notion "no rules" (which is not my notion), I was actually supporting your presented view, only using different expressions. I am very much interested in anarchy and gave sources underneath my texts in recent times.
The term "habit" I picked up from Sheldrake, as he often uses it. With my own interpretation I connect habits with culture, deeply ingrained in peoples. For me, it is of total logic, that cultures breed rules, oftentimes they are (were) in touch with the spiritual connected to the pragmatic. What you called common law, thank you, that's exactly what I meant.
By now you know that I am very much critical towards the happenings. Another part of me, though, tries to take perspectives apart from it, and I do that for my own sanity. Doesn't hurt to share it, I think.
Maybe, for the similarities of some of our interests, I take it for granted that you'll know from which direction I come.
Cool. Your words are always welcome and I only pick yours apart in the same way you pick mine apart. To learn. Thankyou as always.
HaHa, Thank you! :)